Literature DB >> 15007586

Timing of bimanual movements and deafferentation: implications for the role of sensory movement effects.

Knut Drewing1, Prisca Stenneken, Jonathan Cole, Wolfgang Prinz, Gisa Aschersleben.   

Abstract

In a repetitive tapping task, the within-hand variability of intertap intervals is reduced when participants tap with both hands instead of single-handedly. This bimanual advantage has been attributed to timer as opposed to motor variance (according to the Wing-Kristofferson model; Helmuth and Ivry 1996) and related to the additional sensory consequences of the movement of the extra hand in the bimanual case (Drewing et al. 2002). In the present study the effect of sensory feedback of the movement on this advantage was investigated by comparing the results of a person (IW) deafferented below the neck with those of age-matched controls. IW showed an even more pronounced bimanual advantage than controls, suggesting that the bimanual advantage is not due to actual sensory feedback. These results support another hypothesis, namely that bimanual timing profits from the averaging of different central control signals that relate to each effector's movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15007586     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1870-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Age-specific problems in rhythmic timing.

Authors:  R T Krampe; R Engbert; R Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2001-03

2.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation.

Authors:  S J Blakemore; D M Wolpert; C D Frith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action.

Authors:  S J Blakemore; C D Frith; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  The Timing Effects of Accent Production in Periodic Finger-Tapping Sequences.

Authors:  M. Billon; A. Semjen; G. E. Stelmach
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 5.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

6.  When two hands are better than one: reduced timing variability during bimanual movements.

Authors:  L L Helmuth; R B Ivry
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Dissociation of the lateral and medial cerebellum in movement timing and movement execution.

Authors:  R B Ivry; S W Keele; H C Diener
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: evidence for a common timing mechanism.

Authors:  R B Ivry; R E Hazeltine
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Age-related differences in timing control of repetitive movement: application of the Wing-Kristofferson model.

Authors:  L S Greene; H G Williams
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.500

View more
  11 in total

1.  Keeping with the beat: movement trajectories contribute to movement timing.

Authors:  Ramesh Balasubramaniam; Alan M Wing; Andreas Daffertshofer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of feedback from active and passive body parts on spatial and temporal parameters in sensorimotor synchronization.

Authors:  Peter E Keller; Masami Ishihara; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-03-20

3.  Modality specific functional interaction in sensorimotor synchronization.

Authors:  Bettina Pollok; Vanessa Krause; Markus Butz; Alfons Schnitzler
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Auditory and visual information do not affect self-paced bilateral finger tapping in children with DCD.

Authors:  Renuka Roche; Anna Maria Wilms-Floet; Jane E Clark; Jill Whitall
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 5.  Crossing the arms confuses the clocks: sensory feedback and the bimanual advantage.

Authors:  Breanna E Studenka; Kinga L Eliasz; David I Shore; Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

Review 6.  Bimanual coupling paradigm as an effective tool to investigate productive behaviors in motor and body awareness impairments.

Authors:  Francesca Garbarini; Lorenzo Pia
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Timekeeping strategies operate independently from spatial and accuracy demands in beat-interception movements.

Authors:  Marta M N Bieńkiewicz; Matthew W M Rodger; Cathy M Craig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  A rare case of deafferentation reveals an essential role of proprioception in bilateral coordination.

Authors:  Jacob E Schaffer; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.054

9.  A pilot study of sensory feedback by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to improve manipulation deficit caused by severe sensory loss after stroke.

Authors:  Kahori Kita; Yohei Otaka; Kotaro Takeda; Sachiko Sakata; Junichi Ushiba; Kunitsugu Kondo; Meigen Liu; Rieko Osu
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Thresholds of auditory-motor coupling measured with a simple task in musicians and non-musicians: was the sound simultaneous to the key press?

Authors:  Floris T van Vugt; Barbara Tillmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.