Literature DB >> 23475755

The role of top-down control in different phases of a sensorimotor timing task: a DCM study of adults and adolescents.

Suzanne T Witt1, Michael C Stevens.   

Abstract

The ability to precisely coordinate motor control to regularly-paced sensory stimuli requires an ability often called 'mental timekeeping', a distinct form of cognitive function. A consistent feature among conceptual models of the internal clock mechanism is an element of 'top-down' cognitive control. Although lesion and fMRI studies have provided indirect evidence supporting the role of the prefrontal cortex in exerting top-down influence over lower-level sensory and motor regions, little direct evidence exists. We investigated changes in Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM)-measured top-down control of sensorimotor timing during different phases of a unimanual, auditory-paced finger-tapping task in a cohort of healthy adults and adolescents. The brain regions examined were organized into a network of excitatory connections between bilateral dorso- and ventrolateral prefrontal cortices and motor and auditory cortices. This baseline connectivity changed depending on whether participants listened passively to the pacing cue, synchronized their regular interval finger tapping with the cue, or continued tapping in absence of the cue. Subjects who performed better at maintaining the prescribed tapping pace in the absence of the auditory cue relied more on top-down control of the motor and sensory regions, while those with less accurate performance relied more on sensory driven, bottom-up control of the motor cortex. No significant maturational effects were observed in either the behavioral or DCM path weight data. Both right and left prefrontal cortex were found to exert control over timing behavioral accuracy, but there were distinctly lateralized roles with respect to optimal performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23475755      PMCID: PMC3743949          DOI: 10.1007/s11682-013-9224-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav        ISSN: 1931-7557            Impact factor:   3.978


  55 in total

1.  Voluntary timing and brain function: an information processing approach.

Authors:  Alan M Wing
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Bayesian estimation of dynamical systems: an application to fMRI.

Authors:  K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  A midline dissociation between error-processing and response-conflict monitoring.

Authors:  H Garavan; T J Ross; J Kaufman; E A Stein
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series?

Authors:  L Freire; A Roche; J F Mangin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 5.  Neuroimaging studies of working memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Edward E Smith
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Transformation of stimulus value signals into motor commands during simple choice.

Authors:  Todd A Hare; Wolfram Schultz; Colin F Camerer; John P O'Doherty; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Development of distinct control networks through segregation and integration.

Authors:  Damien A Fair; Nico U F Dosenbach; Jessica A Church; Alexander L Cohen; Shefali Brahmbhatt; Francis M Miezin; Deanna M Barch; Marcus E Raichle; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing.

Authors:  Catalin V Buhusi; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  The role of prefrontal regions in the Stroop task.

Authors:  P Vendrell; C Junqué; J Pujol; M A Jurado; J Molet; J Grafman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Age-related differences in timing control of repetitive movement: application of the Wing-Kristofferson model.

Authors:  L S Greene; H G Williams
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.500

View more
  7 in total

1.  The differential effects of unihemispheric and bihemispheric tDCS over the inferior frontal gyrus on proactive control.

Authors:  Jorge Leite; Óscar F Gonçalves; Patrícia Pereira; Niranjan Khadka; Marom Bikson; Felipe Fregni; Sandra Carvalho
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.304

2.  Response Hand and Motor Set Differentially Modulate the Connectivity of Brain Pathways During Simple Uni-manual Motor Behavior.

Authors:  Alexandra Morris; Mathura Ravishankar; Lena Pivetta; Asadur Chowdury; Dimitri Falco; Jessica S Damoiseaux; David R Rosenberg; Steven L Bressler; Vaibhav A Diwadkar
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Reduced striato-cortical and inhibitory transcallosal connectivity in the motor circuit of Huntington's disease patients.

Authors:  Clara Garcia-Gorro; Ruth de Diego-Balaguer; Saul Martínez-Horta; Jesus Pérez-Pérez; Jaime Kulisevsky; Nadia Rodríguez-Dechicha; Irene Vaquer; Susana Subira; Matilde Calopa; Esteban Muñoz; Pilar Santacruz; Jesús Ruiz-Idiago; Celia Mareca; Nuria Caballol; Estela Camara
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Active maintenance of semantic representations.

Authors:  Ryoji Nishiyama
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

5.  Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex modulates supplementary motor area in coordinated unimanual motor behavior.

Authors:  Avisa Asemi; Karthik Ramaseshan; Ashley Burgess; Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Steven L Bressler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Stop signals delay synchrony more for finger tapping than vocalization: a dual modality study of rhythmic synchronization in the stop signal task.

Authors:  Leidy J Castro-Meneses; Paul F Sowman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Motor timing training improves sustained attention performance but not fluid intelligence: near but not far transfer.

Authors:  Olympia Karampela; Guy Madison; Linus Holm
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.