Literature DB >> 8448464

What proportion of congenital abnormalities can be prevented?

A E Czeizel1, Z Intôdy, B Modell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportion of preventable congenital abnormalities in Hungary.
DESIGN: Analysis of available Hungarian data-bases and of the effectiveness of primary, secondary, and tertiary preventive methods.
SETTING: Databases of ad hoc epidemiological studies and of the Hungarian congenital abnormality registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence at birth and prevalence after prevention in 73 congenital abnormality types or groups.
RESULTS: Preventive methods are available for 51 (70%) of the 73 congenital abnormality types or groups evaluated. The birth prevalence of all congenital abnormalities could be reduced from 65 to 26 per 1000; thus 39 per 1000 (60%) are preventable. Without congenital dislocation of the hip, which is unusually common in Hungary, the preventable proportion of congenital abnormalities is 52%.
CONCLUSION: Many congenital abnormalities can be prevented, but as they do not represent a single pathological category there is no single strategy for their prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8448464      PMCID: PMC1676767          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.306.6876.499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  9 in total

1.  Value of routine ultrasound scanning at 19 weeks: a four year study of 8849 deliveries.

Authors:  C A Luck
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-06-06

2.  Prevention of neural tube defect recurrences in Yorkshire: final report.

Authors:  R W Smithells; S Sheppard; J Wild; C J Schorah
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Congenital hip disease in Utah: the influence of genetic and nongenetic factors.

Authors:  C M Woolf; J H Koehn; S S Coleman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Evaluation of information-guidance genetic counselling.

Authors:  A Czeizel; J Métneki; M Osztovics
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Appraisal of a new scheme for prenatal screening for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  T A Sheldon; J Simpson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-05-11

6.  Antenatal maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome: results of a demonstration project.

Authors:  N J Wald; A Kennard; J W Densem; H S Cuckle; T Chard; L Butler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-15

7.  Evaluation of counselling for pregnant women exposed to potentially hazardous environmental factors.

Authors:  A Czeizel; J Métneki
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Hung       Date:  1985

8.  Prevention of the first occurrence of neural-tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation.

Authors:  A E Czeizel; I Dudás
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-12-24       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The activities of the Hungarian Centre for Congenital Anomaly Control.

Authors:  A Czeizel
Journal:  World Health Stat Q       Date:  1988
  9 in total
  27 in total

1.  How do we best detect toxic effects of drugs taken during pregnancy? A EuroMap paper.

Authors:  Jørn Olsen; Andrew Czeizel; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Gunnar Lauge Nielsen; Lolkje T W de Jong van den Berg; Lorentz M Irgens; Charlotte Olesen; Lars Pedersen; Helle Larsen; Rolv T Lie; Corinne S de Vries; Ulf Bergman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Congenital disorders: epidemiological methods for answering calls for action.

Authors:  Bernadette Modell; Matthew W Darlison; Helen Malherbe; Sowmiya Moorthie; Hannah Blencowe; Ramez Mahaini; Maha El-Adawy
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2018-09-19

Review 3.  Assessing the safety of drugs in pregnancy: the role of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  C Irl; J Hasford
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  A population-based case-control teratologic study of oral dipyrone treatment during pregnancy.

Authors:  Ferenc Bánhidy; Nándor Acs; Erzsébet Puhó; Andrew E Czeizel
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Preventing congenital abnormalities.

Authors:  S N Huddart; A Bianchi; C M Doig; A P Dickson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-27

6.  Preventing congenital abnormalities.

Authors:  P Saunders
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-27

7.  Mortality among infants with congenital malformations, New York State, 1983 to 1988.

Authors:  C Druschel; J P Hughes; C Olsen
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Prevention of congenital abnormalities by periconceptional multivitamin supplementation.

Authors:  A E Czeizel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-06-19

9.  The profile of major congenital abnormalities in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) population.

Authors:  L I al-Gazali; A H Dawodu; K Sabarinathan; M Varghese
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  No association of maternal vitamin E intake with higher risk of cardiovascular malformations in children: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Mária Szilasi; Liza Bártfai; Zoltán Bártfai; Ferenc Bánhidy; Andrew E Czeizel
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2011-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.