Literature DB >> 10738841

Assessing the safety of drugs in pregnancy: the role of prospective cohort studies.

C Irl1, J Hasford.   

Abstract

Since, for obvious reasons, systematic testing of the teratogenic properties of drugs in humans is not possible in the premarketing phase, the epidemiological approaches to postmarketing risk evaluation are of major importance. Cohort studies, with their prospective exposure assessment, their ability to study even exposure to drugs not commonly used in pregnancy, and their ability to monitor both adverse and beneficial fetal outcomes, seem to be the most promising study type from a methodological viewpoint. Although there are numerous cohort studies on the harmful effects of drug use in pregnant women, only a few have been able to demonstrate a risk in terms of an increase in the prevalence of malformations. Most studies with significant findings were those investigating the risk potential of one group of drugs, the anticonvulsants. The lack of cohort studies showing a risk for drug use in pregnancy, however, is not necessarily indicative of some methodological deficiency. Rather, it may suggest that, for the majority of drugs, their use in pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of congenital malformations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10738841     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200022030-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  32 in total

1.  Safety of first trimester exposure to histamine H2 blockers. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  L A Magee; G Inocencion; L Kamboj; F Rosetti; G Koren
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Course of pregnancy and fetal outcome following maternal exposure to carbamazepine and phenytoin: a prospective study.

Authors:  D J Gladstone; M Bologa; C Maguire; A Pastuszak; G Koren
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.143

3.  Postmarketing surveillance of lovastatin and simvastatin exposure during pregnancy.

Authors:  J M Manson; C Freyssinges; M B Ducrocq; W P Stephenson
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.143

4.  On the ability of birth defects monitoring to detect new teratogens.

Authors:  M J Khoury; N A Holtzman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  An investigation of report bias in a case-control study of pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  S G Mackenzie; A Lippman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Safety of fluconazole in the treatment of vaginal candidiasis. A prescription-event monitoring study, with special reference to the outcome of pregnancy.

Authors:  W Inman; G Pearce; L Wilton
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Outcomes of pregnancy associated with antiepileptic drugs.

Authors:  C H Waters; Y Belai; P S Gott; P Shen; C M De Giorgio
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1994-03

8.  Determinants of recall and recall bias in studying drug and chemical exposure in pregnancy.

Authors:  Y Feldman; G Koren; K Mattice; H Shear; E Pellegrini; S M MacLeod
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1989-07

9.  Effect of questionnaire design on recall of drug exposure in pregnancy.

Authors:  A A Mitchell; L B Cottler; S Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  The safety of calcium channel blockers in human pregnancy: a prospective, multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  L A Magee; B Schick; A E Donnenfeld; S R Sage; B Conover; L Cook; P R McElhatton; M A Schmidt; G Koren
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Improving safety reporting from randomised trials.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Joseph Lau
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Exposed or not exposed? Exploring exposure classification in studies using administrative data to investigate outcomes following medication use during pregnancy.

Authors:  Luke E Grzeskowiak; Andrew L Gilbert; Janna L Morrison
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Investigating outcomes following the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for treating depression in pregnancy: a focus on methodological issues.

Authors:  Luke E Grzeskowiak; Andrew L Gilbert; Janna L Morrison
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Advice on drug safety in pregnancy: are there differences between commonly used sources of information?

Authors:  Sofia K Frost Widnes; Jan Schjøtt
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  A priori choice of neuraxial labour analgesia and breastfeeding initiation success: a community-based cohort study in an Italian baby-friendly hospital.

Authors:  Roberto Giorgio Wetzl; Enrica Delfino; Luca Peano; Daniela Gogna; Yvette Vidi; Francesca Vielmi; Eleonora Bianquin; Serena Cerioli; Maria Enrica Bettinelli; Maria Lorella Giannì; Gabriella Frassy; Elena Boris; Cesare Arioni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.