Literature DB >> 11820910

How do we best detect toxic effects of drugs taken during pregnancy? A EuroMap paper.

Jørn Olsen1, Andrew Czeizel, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Gunnar Lauge Nielsen, Lolkje T W de Jong van den Berg, Lorentz M Irgens, Charlotte Olesen, Lars Pedersen, Helle Larsen, Rolv T Lie, Corinne S de Vries, Ulf Bergman.   

Abstract

It is a major clinical and public health problem that there is no clear strategy as to how we best make use of information obtained when pregnant women take drugs. For this reason, some pregnant women are not treated as they should be and some are given drugs they should not use. We suggest a monitoring system that combines some of the available datasets in Europe. Using these sources as a starting point, one can develop a system that has sufficient power to detect even rare diseases like congenital malformations and sufficient diversity to detect several possible outcomes from spontaneous abortions to childhood disorders. We also suggest that case-crossover designs should be used in case-control monitoring systems that carry a high risk of recall bias. These considerations are based upon our results from a European Union-funded concerted action called EuroMaP (Medicine and Pregnancy).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11820910     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200225010-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  47 in total

1.  Reporting bias in retrospective ascertainment of drug-induced embryopathy.

Authors:  B Bar-Oz; M E Moretti; G Mareels; T Van Tittelboom; G Koren
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-11-13       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Thalidomide embryopathy.

Authors:  W LENZ; K KNAPP
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1962-08

3.  Drug use in pregnancy: a comparative appraisal of data collecting methods.

Authors:  L T de Jong-van den Berg; C M Waardenburg; F M Haaijer-Ruskamp; M N Dukes; H Wesseling
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Calculating risk ratios for spontaneous abortions: the problem of induced abortions.

Authors:  J Olsen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Pregnancy outcome after cyclosporine therapy during pregnancy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  B Bar Oz; R Hackman; T Einarson; G Koren
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2001-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Improvement of drug exposure data in a registration of congenital anomalies. Pilot-study: pharmacist and mother as sources for drug exposure data during pregnancy. EuroMAP Group. Europen Medicine and Pregnancy Group.

Authors:  L T De Jong van den Berg; N Feenstra; H T Sorensen; M C Cornel
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1999-07

7.  First 25 years of the Hungarian congenital abnormality registry.

Authors:  A E Czeizel
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1997-05

8.  Serious life events and congenital malformations: a national study with complete follow-up.

Authors:  D Hansen; H C Lou; J Olsen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-09-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  In utero exposure to phenobarbital and intelligence deficits in adult men.

Authors:  J M Reinisch; S A Sanders; E L Mortensen; D B Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Completeness of the discharge diagnoses as a measure of birth defects recorded in the hospital birth record.

Authors:  E E Calle; M J Khoury
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Data resources for investigating drug exposure during pregnancy and associated outcomes: the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) as an alternative to pregnancy registries.

Authors:  Rachel A Charlton; Marianne C Cunnington; Corinne S de Vries; John G Weil
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Maternal use of Loratadine during pregnancy and risk of hypospadias in offspring.

Authors:  Lars Pedersen; Mette Vinther Skriver; Mette Nørgaard; Henrik Toft Sørensen
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Recruiting pregnant smokers for a placebo-randomised controlled trial of nicotine replacement therapy.

Authors:  Tim Coleman; Marilyn Antoniak; John Britton; Jim Thornton; Sarah Lewis; Kim Watts
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Effects of nicotine during pregnancy: human and experimental evidence.

Authors:  R Wickström
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.363

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.