Literature DB >> 8448377

Comparative genomic hybridization: a rapid new method for detecting and mapping DNA amplification in tumors.

O P Kallioniemi1, A Kallioniemi, D Sudar, D Rutovitz, J W Gray, F Waldman, D Pinkel.   

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that many more genes than the currently known oncogenes may undergo amplification in tumors. We have developed a new technique, Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH), which allows rapid detection of DNA amplification anywhere in the tumor genome and maps the amplified sequences on normal chromosomes. CGH is based on a competitive in situ hybridization of differentially labeled tumor DNA and normal DNA to a normal human metaphase spread. Regions of gain of DNA sequences are seen as an increased color ratio of two fluorochromes used to detect the labeled DNAs. Over 20 different regions of amplification have been identified using CGH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8448377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol        ISSN: 1044-579X            Impact factor:   15.707


  35 in total

Review 1.  Comparative genomic hybridisation.

Authors:  M M Weiss; M A Hermsen; G A Meijer; N C van Grieken; J P Baak; E J Kuipers; P J van Diest
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  1999-10

2.  Comprehensive expression profiling of highly homologous 39 hox genes in 26 different human adult tissues by the modified systematic multiplex RT-pCR method reveals tissue-specific expression pattern that suggests an important role of chromosomal structure in the regulation of hox gene expression in adult tissues.

Authors:  Miyako Yamamoto; Daisaku Takai; Fumiya Yamamoto; Fumiichiro Yamamoto
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  2003

3.  A DNA microarray-based methylation-sensitive (MS)-AFLP hybridization method for genetic and epigenetic analyses.

Authors:  F Yamamoto; M Yamamoto
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 3.291

4.  Twist overexpression promotes chromosomal instability in the breast cancer cell line MCF-7.

Authors:  Farhad Vesuna; Paul Winnard; Carlotta Glackin; Venu Raman
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2006-06

5.  A new platform linking chromosomal and sequence information.

Authors:  Agata Kowalska; Eva Bozsaky; Thomas Ramsauer; Dietmar Rieder; Gabriela Bindea; Thomas Lörch; Zlatko Trajanoski; Peter F Ambros
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 6.  Methods and strategies for analyzing copy number variation using DNA microarrays.

Authors:  Nigel P Carter
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Specific loss of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21 in chromophobe renal cell carcinomas revealed by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  M R Speicher; B Schoell; S du Manoir; E Schröck; T Ried; T Cremer; S Störkel; A Kovacs; G Kovacs
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  waviCGH: a web application for the analysis and visualization of genomic copy number alterations.

Authors:  Angel Carro; Daniel Rico; Oscar M Rueda; Ramón Díaz-Uriarte; David G Pisano
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Validation and implementation of array comparative genomic hybridisation as a first line test in place of postnatal karyotyping for genome imbalance.

Authors:  Joo Wook Ahn; Kathy Mann; Sally Walsh; Marwa Shehab; Sarah Hoang; Zoe Docherty; Shehla Mohammed; Caroline Mackie Ogilvie
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  DNA gains and losses of chromosome in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma using comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Ibrahim Keser; Ahter D Toraman; Gulay Ozbilim; Kenan Guney; Guven Luleci
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.