Literature DB >> 8445422

Influence of treatment schedule on toxicity and efficacy of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil in metastatic breast cancer: a randomized trial comparing weekly and every-4-week administration.

C Blomqvist1, I Elomaa, P Rissanen, P Hietanen, K Nevasaari, L Helle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the effect on toxicity and efficacy of the fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 (FEC) regimen divided into 4 weekly doses with conventional every-4-week administration in metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The inclusion criteria demanded measurable or assessable metastases from breast cancer and a World Health Organization (WHO) performance index of 2 or less. One hundred seventy-three patients with metastatic breast cancer who had not been treated with anthracyclines were randomized to receive FEC once every 4 weeks or once a week. The scheduled monthly doses of the cytotoxic agents were identical in both groups. Three patients were excluded from analysis.
RESULTS: Hematologic toxicity, alopecia, nausea, and vomiting were significantly more severe in the group that received treatment every 4 weeks. The response rate was higher in the group that received FEC every 4 weeks than in the group treated weekly (47% v 30%, P = .02). Time to progression was significantly (P = .005) longer with every-4-week FEC treatment (median, 9.2 months v 5.4 months for weekly treatment). Patients in the group treated every 4 weeks lived significantly (P = .01) longer than patients treated weekly (median survival times, 21.2 months v 11.8 months, respectively). The actually delivered monthly dose levels and treatment duration were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Both efficacy and toxicity of FEC were greater when treatment was administered every 4 weeks rather than once a week, despite identical dose intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8445422     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  9 in total

1.  A dose-schedule finding design for phase I-II clinical trials.

Authors:  Beibei Guo; Yisheng Li; Ying Yuan
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 1.864

Review 2.  Epirubicin: a review of its efficacy as adjuvant therapy and in the treatment of metastatic disease in breast cancer.

Authors:  D Ormrod; K Holm; K Goa; C Spencer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Epirubicin. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of breast cancer.

Authors:  A J Coukell; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Combination drug delivery approaches in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Jun H Lee; Anjan Nan
Journal:  J Drug Deliv       Date:  2012-04-26

5.  Predictive value of c-erbB-2, p53, cathepsin-D and histology of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  E Niskanen; C Blomqvist; K Franssila; P Hietanen; V M Wasenius
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Different dosage schedules for reducing cardiotoxicity in people with cancer receiving anthracycline chemotherapy.

Authors:  Elvira C van Dalen; Helena J H van der Pal; Leontien C M Kremer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-03

7.  A multivariate analysis of tumour biological factors predicting response to cytotoxic treatment in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  J Sjöström; S Krajewski; K Franssila; E Niskanen; V M Wasenius; S Nordling; J C Reed; C Blomqvist
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Do DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction in primary tumour predict the response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer?

Authors:  P Hietanen; C Blomqvist; V M Wasenius; E Niskanen; K Franssila; S Nordling
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Is drug-induced toxicity a good predictor of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer?--a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Vinay Singhal; J P Singh; Ashima Lyall; Sunita Saxena; Anju Bansal
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.