Literature DB >> 26877554

A dose-schedule finding design for phase I-II clinical trials.

Beibei Guo1, Yisheng Li2, Ying Yuan2.   

Abstract

Dose-finding methods aiming at identifying an optimal dose of a treatment with a given schedule may be at a risk of misidentifying the best treatment for patients. In this article we propose a phase I/II clinical trial design to find the optimal dose-schedule combination. We define schedule as the method and timing of administration of a given total dose in a treatment cycle. We propose a Bayesian dynamic model for the joint effects of dose and schedule. The proposed model allows us to borrow strength across dose-schedule combinations without making overly restrictive assumptions on the ordering pattern of the schedule effects. We develop a dose-schedule-finding algorithm to sequentially allocate patients to a desirable dose-schedule combination, and select an optimal combination at the end of the trial. We apply the proposed design to a phase I/II clinical trial of a γ-secretase inhibitor in patients with refractory metastatic or locally advanced solid tumours, and examine the operating characteristics of the design through simulations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian dynamic model; dose-schedule combination; efficacy; probit model; schedule-response relationship; toxicity

Year:  2016        PMID: 26877554      PMCID: PMC4747255          DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat        ISSN: 0035-9254            Impact factor:   1.864


  17 in total

1.  A phase I/II trial combining high-dose melphalan and autologous transplant with bortezomib for multiple myeloma: a dose- and schedule-finding study.

Authors:  Sagar Lonial; Jonathan Kaufman; Mourad Tighiouart; Ajay Nooka; Amelia A Langston; Leonard T Heffner; Claire Torre; Stephanie McMillan; Heather Renfroe; R Donald Harvey; Mary J Lechowicz; H Jean Khoury; Christopher R Flowers; Edmund K Waller
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  A strategy for dose-finding and safety monitoring based on efficacy and adverse outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; K E Russell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A randomized trial to evaluate the effect of schedule on the activity of etoposide in small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M L Slevin; P I Clark; S P Joel; S Malik; R J Osborne; W M Gregory; D G Lowe; R H Reznek; P F Wrigley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Dose--schedule finding in phase I/II clinical trials using a Bayesian isotonic transformation.

Authors:  Yisheng Li; B Nebiyou Bekele; Yuan Ji; John D Cook
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A randomized trial of two etoposide schedules in small-cell lung cancer: the influence of pharmacokinetics on efficacy and toxicity.

Authors:  P I Clark; M L Slevin; S P Joel; R J Osborne; D I Talbot; P W Johnson; R Reznek; T Masud; W Gregory; P F Wrigley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Intermittent target inhibition with dasatinib 100 mg once daily preserves efficacy and improves tolerability in imatinib-resistant and -intolerant chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Neil P Shah; Hagop M Kantarjian; Dong-Wook Kim; Delphine Réa; Pedro E Dorlhiac-Llacer; Jorge H Milone; Jorge Vela-Ojeda; Richard T Silver; H Jean Khoury; Aude Charbonnier; Nina Khoroshko; Ronald L Paquette; Michael Deininger; Robert H Collins; Irma Otero; Timothy Hughes; Eric Bleickardt; Lewis Strauss; Stephen Francis; Andreas Hochhaus
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A Bayesian Dose-finding Design for Oncology Clinical Trials of Combinational Biological Agents.

Authors:  Chunyan Cai; Ying Yuan; Yuan Ji
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.864

8.  Influence of treatment schedule on toxicity and efficacy of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil in metastatic breast cancer: a randomized trial comparing weekly and every-4-week administration.

Authors:  C Blomqvist; I Elomaa; P Rissanen; P Hietanen; K Nevasaari; L Helle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Phase I trial of two schedules of vincristine, oral irinotecan, and temozolomide (VOIT) for children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group phase I consortium study.

Authors:  Lars M Wagner; John P Perentesis; Joel M Reid; Matthew M Ames; Stephanie L Safgren; Marvin D Nelson; Ashish M Ingle; Susan M Blaney; Peter C Adamson
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.167

10.  Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.

Authors:  Beibei Guo; Yisheng Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  6 in total

1.  A robust Bayesian dose-finding design for phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  Suyu Liu; Valen E Johnson
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  An adaptive trial design to optimize dose-schedule regimes with delayed outcomes.

Authors:  Ruitao Lin; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  TITE-BOIN12: A Bayesian phase I/II trial design to find the optimal biological dose with late-onset toxicity and efficacy.

Authors:  Yanhong Zhou; Ruitao Lin; J Jack Lee; Daniel Li; Li Wang; Ruobing Li; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Designs for phase I trials in ordered groups.

Authors:  Mark R Conaway; Nolan A Wages
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Bayesian dose regimen assessment in early phase oncology incorporating pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Emma Gerard; Sarah Zohar; Hoai-Thu Thai; Christelle Lorenzato; Marie-Karelle Riviere; Moreno Ursino
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 1.701

6.  Comparison of Phase I-II designs with parametric or semi-parametric models using two different risk-benefit trade-off criteria.

Authors:  Andrew G Chapple; Peter F Thall
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.261

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.