Literature DB >> 8441947

Lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical/radiologic therapeutic evaluation in 145 patients. Conservative treatment or surgical intervention?

D Onel1, H Sari, C Dönmez.   

Abstract

In this prospective study, 145 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were evaluated for clinical signs and radiologic findings and conservative treatment results. Clinical parameters such as pain on motion, lumbar range of motion, straight leg raising test, deep tendon reflexes, dermatomal sensations, motor functions and neurogenic claudication distances were assessed at admission and were compared after a conservative treatment program was completed. A conservative treatment program consisted of physical therapy (infrared heating, ultrasonic diathermy and active lumbar exercises) and salmon calcitonin. Pain on motion (100%), restriction of extension (77%), limited straight leg raising test (23%), neurogenic claudication (100%), dermatomal sensory impairment (47%), motor deficit (29%), and reflex deficit (40%) were observed in the patients. All aforementioned disturbances except reflex deficits improved by the conservative treatment and results were statistically significant. The authors conclude that this conservative treatment should be the treatment of choice in elderly patients and in those patients without clinical surgical indications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8441947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  22 in total

1.  Randomised placebo-controlled trial on the effectiveness of nasal salmon calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Suhayl I Tafazal; Leslie Ng; Philip Sell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Investigating non-operative treatment options for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Vinod K Podichetty; Mazanec Daniel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Loading is more effective than posture in lumbar spinal stenosis: a study with a treadmill equipment.

Authors:  Hasan Oğuz; Funda Levendoğlu; Tunç Cevat Oğün; Aysenur Tantuğ
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Effects of calcitonin on lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kun Peng; Long Chen; Jing Peng; Fei Xing; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

5.  Three-step treadmill test and McKenzie mechanical diagnosis and therapy to establish directional preference in a patient with lumbar spinal stenosis: a case report.

Authors:  G Padmanabhan; A Sambasivan; M J Desai
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-02

Review 6.  Physical therapy interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Luciana Gazzi Macedo; Abraham Hum; Laura Kuleba; Joey Mo; Linda Truong; Mankeen Yeung; Michele C Battié
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-07-25

Review 7.  Lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Stephane Genevay; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.098

8.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography-myelography for quantitative evaluation of lumbar intracanalar cross-section.

Authors:  Hiroyasu Ogura; Kei Miyamoto; Shoji Fukuta; Toshitaka Naganawa; Katsuji Shimizu
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results.

Authors:  J F Zucherman; K Y Hsu; C A Hartjen; T F Mehalic; D A Implicito; M J Martin; D R Johnson; G A Skidmore; P P Vessa; J W Dwyer; S Puccio; J C Cauthen; R M Ozuna
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  The efficacy of physical therapy and physical therapy plus calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Fusun Sahin; Figen Yilmaz; Nurdan Kotevoglu; Banu Kuran
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.