Linkage analysis of "necessary" disease loci versus "susceptibility" loci.

The association of some diseases with specific alleles of certain genetic markers has been difficult to explain. Several explanations have been proposed for the phenomenon of association, e.g. the existence of multiple, interacting genes (epistasis) or a disease locus in linkage disequilibrium with the marker locus. One might suppose that when marker data from families with associated diseases are analyzed for linkage, the existence of the association would assure that linkage will be found, and found at a tight recombination fraction. In fact, however, linkage analyses of some diseases associated with HLA, as well as diseases associated with alleles at other loci located throughout the genome, show significant evidence against linkage, and others show loose linkage, to the puzzlement of many researchers. In part, the puzzlement arises because linkage analysis is ideal for looking for loci that are necessary, even if not sufficient, for disease expression but may be much less useful for finding loci that are neither necessary nor sufficient for disease expression (so-called susceptibility loci). This work explores what happens when one looks for linkage to susceptibility loci. A susceptibility locus in this case means that the allele increases risk but is neither necessary nor sufficient for disease expression. It might be either an allele at the marker locus itself that is increasing susceptibility or an allele at a locus in linkage disequilibrium with the marker. This work uses computer simulation to examine how linkage analyses behave when confronted with data from such a model.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)