Literature DB >> 8433916

An experimental evaluation of three theories of auditory stream segregation.

W L Rogers1, A S Bregman.   

Abstract

Three theories of auditory stream segregation were evaluated. In two-part trials, subjects heard an induction sequence, whose effects upon an immediately subsequent test sequence were measured. The rhythm and total duration of Induction Sequence tones were varied in two experiments. The similarity between induction and test sequences aided segregation, but rhythmic predictability and longer tone durations did not. Frequency alternation during the induction sequence was not necessary to induce segregation in the test sequence. Furthermore, peripheral processes inadequately account for the segregation effects found. The data suggest that, once a distinct percept emerges from an auditory scene, properties derived from the percept (particularly changes) are fed back to control the ongoing analysis of that auditory scene. A neural adaptation to stimuli with constant properties may form part of this analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8433916     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  12 in total

1.  Auditory segregation: stream or streams?

Authors:  A S Bregman; A I Rudnicky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Restarting the adapted binaural system.

Authors:  E R Hafter; T N Buell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones.

Authors:  A S Bregman; J Campbell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-08

Review 4.  Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory.

Authors:  M R Jones
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Auditory streaming is cumulative.

Authors:  A S Bregman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Auditory streaming: competition among alternative organizations.

Authors:  A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-05

7.  Evidence for rhythmic attention.

Authors:  M R Jones; G Kidd; R Wetzel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Adaptation to apparent motion.

Authors:  S Anstis; D Giaschi; A I Cogan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Competition among auditory streaming, dichotic fusion, and diotic fusion.

Authors:  H Steiger; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-08

10.  Ambiguous musical figures and auditory streaming.

Authors:  J Smith; S Hausfeld; R P Power; A Gorta
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-11
View more
  17 in total

1.  Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-24

2.  Role of serial order in the impact of talker variability on short-term memory: testing a perceptual organization-based account.

Authors:  Robert W Hughes; John E Marsh; Dylan M Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-11

3.  Speech intelligibility in rooms: Disrupting the effect of prior listening exposure.

Authors:  Eugene J Brandewie; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Role of pattern, regularity, and silent intervals in auditory stream segregation based on inter-aural time differences.

Authors:  David Carl; Alexander Gutschalk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Evidence for stimulus-general impairments on auditory stream segregation tasks in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Erin M Ramage; David M Weintraub; Daniel N Allen; Joel S Snyder
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.791

6.  Adaptation reveals multiple levels of representation in auditory stream segregation.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Olivia L Carter; Erin E Hannon; Claude Alain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Frequency discrimination in rats measured with tone-step stimuli and discrete pure tones.

Authors:  Andrew M Sloan; Owen T Dodd; Robert L Rennaker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Properties of auditory stream formation.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Hedwig E Gockel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Modulations of neural activity in auditory streaming caused by spectral and temporal alternation in subsequent stimuli: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  Ivan Chakalov; Rossitza Draganova; Andreas Wollbrink; Hubert Preissl; Christo Pantev
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Attention, awareness, and the perception of auditory scenes.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Melissa K Gregg; David M Weintraub; Claude Alain
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.