Literature DB >> 19258029

Frequency discrimination in rats measured with tone-step stimuli and discrete pure tones.

Andrew M Sloan1, Owen T Dodd, Robert L Rennaker.   

Abstract

Two modified go/no-go tasks are compared for the measurement of frequency discrimination in albino rats. The first task required detection of an instantaneous, phase-matched frequency change, called a "tone-step," within a continuous reference tone. The more traditional second task required detection of a frequency change between repetitions of a reference sequence of repeating discrete tones. For each task frequency difference limens were measured over a range of reference frequencies from 2.31 to 27.7 kHz at 60 dB sound pressure level, with both upward and downward frequency shifts. All 24 subjects quickly learned the "tone-step" task to criterion, but only 13 could also learn the discrete tone task. Subjects' performance at either task generally improved with increasing reference frequency, and in both tasks upward frequency change thresholds were significantly higher than thresholds for downward changes. Overall mean Weber ratios were 1.73+/-0.27% for the "tone-step" task and 2.76+/-0.29% for the discrete tone task. However, subjects' performance on the "tone-step" task was not correlated with subsequent performance on the discrete tone task. We suggest that the lack of correspondence between tasks might be due to frequency discrimination processes interacting with short-term memory traces during inter-tone intervals in the discrete tone task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19258029      PMCID: PMC2670949          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  32 in total

1.  Discrimination of frequency steps linked by glides of various durations.

Authors:  A Sek; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Decision processes in frequency discrimination.

Authors:  W Jesteadt; S L Sims
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal acuity as a function of frequency difference.

Authors:  C C Wier; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Measurement of auditory intensity thresholds in the rat by conditioning of an autonomic response.

Authors:  J H JAMISON
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1951-04

5.  The decline of pitch discrimination with time.

Authors:  J D HARRIS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1952-02

6.  Auditory sensitivity of the albino rat.

Authors:  J B Kelly; B Masterton
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1977-08

7.  Auditory processing of frequency ramps.

Authors:  S Arlinger
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec

8.  Auditory frequency and intensity discrimination in pigmented rats.

Authors:  J Syka; N Rybalko; G Brozek; M Jilek
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  A signal detection analysis of auditory-frequency discrimination in the rat.

Authors:  S K Talwar; G L Gerstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory frequency discrimination in the white rat.

Authors:  S K Talwar; G L Gerstein
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  9 in total

1.  Intracellular correlates of stimulus-specific adaptation.

Authors:  Itai Hershenhoren; Nevo Taaseh; Flora M Antunes; Israel Nelken
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Sound sensitivity of neurons in rat hippocampus during performance of a sound-guided task.

Authors:  Pavel M Itskov; Ekaterina Vinnik; Christian Honey; Jan Schnupp; Mathew E Diamond
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Behavioral measures of auditory streaming in ferrets (Mustela putorius).

Authors:  Ling Ma; Christophe Micheyl; Pingbo Yin; Andrew J Oxenham; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Detection and identification of speech sounds using cortical activity patterns.

Authors:  T M Centanni; A M Sloan; A C Reed; C T Engineer; R L Rennaker; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  A fully automated and highly versatile system for testing multi-cognitive functions and recording neuronal activities in rodents.

Authors:  Weimin Zheng; Edgar A Ycu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Auditory map reorganization and pitch discrimination in adult rats chronically exposed to low-level ambient noise.

Authors:  Weimin Zheng
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-11

7.  Minimal impairment in a rat model of duration discrimination following excitotoxic lesions of primary auditory and prefrontal cortices.

Authors:  Shraddha Pai; Jeffrey C Erlich; Charles Kopec; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-27

8.  Prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle reflex as a function of the frequency difference between prepulse and background sounds in mice.

Authors:  Sidhesh Basavaraj; Jun Yan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Speech sound processing deficits and training-induced neural plasticity in rats with dyslexia gene knockdown.

Authors:  Tracy M Centanni; Fuyi Chen; Anne M Booker; Crystal T Engineer; Andrew M Sloan; Robert L Rennaker; Joseph J LoTurco; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.