Literature DB >> 8433140

Chronic motor cortex stimulation in patients with thalamic pain.

T Tsubokawa1, Y Katayama, T Yamamoto, T Hirayama, S Koyama.   

Abstract

Analysis of the authors' experience over the last 10 years has indicated that excellent pain control has rarely been obtained by thalamic relay nucleus stimulation in patients with thalamic pain. In the present study, 11 patients with thalamic pain were treated by chronic stimulation of the precentral gyrus. In eight patients (73%), the stimulation system was internalized since excellent pain control was achieved during a 1-week test period of precentral gyrus stimulation. In contrast, no clear effect was noted or the original pain was even exacerbated by postcentral gyrus stimulation. The effect of precentral stimulation was unchanged in five patients (45%) for follow-up periods of more than 2 years. In the remaining three patients, the effect decreased gradually over several months. This outcome was significantly better than that obtained in an earlier series tested by the authors with thalamic relay nucleus stimulation (p < 0.05). The pain inhibition usually occurred at intensities below the threshold for production of muscle contraction (pulse duration 0.1 to 0.5 msec, intensity 3 to 8 V). When good pain inhibition was achieved, the patients reported a slight tingling or mild vibration sensation during stimulation projected in the same area of distribution as their pain. The authors discuss the possibility that, in deafferentation pain, sensory neurons below the level of deafferentation cannot exert their normal inhibitory influences toward deafferented nociceptive neurons because of the development of aberrant connections. Thus, while stimulation of the first- to third-order sensory neurons at the level of the thalamic relay nucleus or below cannot bring about good pain inhibition in patients with thalamic pain, activation of hypothetical fourth-order sensory neurons through precentral stimulation may be able to inhibit deafferented nociceptive neurons within the cortex. None of the patients developed either observable or electroencephalographic seizure activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8433140     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1993.78.3.0393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  67 in total

Review 1.  Invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Nguyen; Julien Nizard; Yves Keravel; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Effects of motor cortical stimulation on the excitability of contralateral motor and sensory cortices.

Authors:  Hitoshi Mochizuki; Yasuo Terao; Shingo Okabe; Toshiaki Furubayashi; Noritoshi Arai; Nobue K Iwata; Ritsuko Hanajima; Keiko Kamakura; Kazuo Motoyoshi; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Developing an optimized strategy with transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance the endogenous pain control system in fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Dante Duarte; Luis Eduardo Coutinho Castelo-Branco; Elif Uygur Kucukseymen; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Modelling motor cortex stimulation for chronic pain control: electrical potential field, activating functions and responses of simple nerve fibre models.

Authors:  L Manola; B H Roelofsen; J Holsheimer; E Marani; J Geelen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Treatment of cancer pain with noninvasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Gisele Silva; Rebecca Miksad; Steven D Freedman; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Sanjay Jain; Daniela L Gomes; Edson J Amancio; Paulo S Boggio; Claudio F Correa; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Motor cortex stimulation in rats with chronic constriction injury.

Authors:  Simon Vaculín; Miloslav Franek; Anna Yamamotová; Richard Rokyta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a review.

Authors:  Raffaele Nardone; Yvonne Höller; Stefan Leis; Peter Höller; Natasha Thon; Aljoscha Thomschewski; Stefan Golaszewski; Francesco Brigo; Eugen Trinka
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Neuromodulation Management of Chronic Neuropathic Pain in The Central Nervous system.

Authors:  Kai Yu; Xiaodan Niu; Bin He
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 18.808

9.  Self-other resonance, its control and prosocial inclinations: Brain-behavior relationships.

Authors:  Leonardo Christov-Moore; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Motor cortex stimulation suppresses cortical responses to noxious hindpaw stimulation after spinal cord lesion in rats.

Authors:  Li Jiang; Yadong Ji; Pamela J Voulalas; Michael Keaser; Su Xu; Rao P Gullapalli; Joel Greenspan; Radi Masri
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.