Literature DB >> 8431365

Age, socio-economic status and survival from cancer of cervix in the West of Scotland 1980-87.

D W Lamont1, R P Symonds, M M Brodie, N J Nwabineli, C R Gillis.   

Abstract

The outcome of treatment by age and socio-economic status was examined for 1,588 women with invasive cancer of cervix resident in the West of Scotland and diagnosed between 1980 and 1987. There was no difference in prognosis according to either variable once analysis was controlled for stage at presentation, treatment type and tumour grade. Tumour histology, date of treatment and health board of residence had no significant effect on survival independent of other variables. A strong correlation was found between socio-economic status and the incidence of cervical cancer in the West of Scotland. Women aged 45 and over and living in deprived areas were more likely to present with later stage tumours and to survive less well than younger patients from the more affluent parts of the region. Any additional resources which may be made available for cervical cancer screening should be directed more effectively towards those most at risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8431365      PMCID: PMC1968157          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1993.64

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  20 in total

1.  Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organised screening programmes.

Authors:  E Lăără; N E Day; M Hakama
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-30       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  The Cardiff Cervical Cytology Study. Prevalence and epidemiology of cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  P Sweetnam; D M Evans; B M Hibbard; J M Jones
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Screening for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Dundee and Angus 1962-81 and its relation with invasive cervical cancer.

Authors:  H L Duguid; I D Duncan; J Currie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-11-09       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Low survival of South African urban black women with cervical cancer.

Authors:  A R Walker; B F Walker; D Siwedi; C Isaacson; C J Van Gelderen; A Andronikou; I Segal
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1985-12

5.  A case-control study of cervical cancer screening in north east Scotland.

Authors:  J E Macgregor; S M Moss; D M Parkin; N E Day
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-05-25

6.  Factors associated wih high and low risk of cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  E Fasal; M E Simmons; J B Kampert
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Analysis of trends in cancer mortality in England and Wales during 1951-80 separating changes associated with period of birth and period of death.

Authors:  C Osmond; M J Gardner; E D Acheson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-04-03

8.  Trends in cervical cancer and carcinoma in situ in Great Britain.

Authors:  G A Cook; G J Draper
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Socioeconomic differences in cancer survival.

Authors:  M Kogevinas; M G Marmot; A J Fox; P O Goldblatt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

1.  Relation between socioeconomic status and tumour stage in patients with breast, colorectal, ovarian, and lung cancer: results from four national, population based studies.

Authors:  D H Brewster; C S Thomson; D J Hole; R J Black; P L Stroner; C R Gillis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-07

2.  Measuring social class differences in cancer patient survival: is it necessary to control for social class differences in general population mortality? A Finnish population-based study.

Authors:  P W Dickman; A Auvinen; E T Voutilainen; T Hakulinen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  An international comparison of cancer survival: Toronto, Ontario, and Detroit, Michigan, metropolitan areas.

Authors:  K M Gorey; E J Holowaty; G Fehringer; E Laukkanen; A Moskowitz; D J Webster; N L Richter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Reproductive factors and prognosis of uterine cervical cancer in Norway.

Authors:  T Bjørge; O Kravdal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Cancer patient survival by socioeconomic status in seven countries: a review for six common cancer sites [corrected].

Authors:  C T Schrijvers; J P Mackenbach
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  D W Lamont; R P Symonds
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Advanced-stage cervix cancer: rapid tumour growth rather than late diagnosis.

Authors:  P Symonds; B Bolger; D Hole; J H Mao; T Cooke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.