Literature DB >> 8428095

MR imaging of the breast.

S E Harms1, D P Flamig.   

Abstract

The current strategy for breast cancer treatment involves early detection of the neoplasm before it has metastasized outside the breast, and surgical treatment of the lesion that minimizes deformity. Conventional methods of diagnostic imaging of the breast, including mammography, sonography, and galactography, do not adequately address clinical needs with regard to lesion characterization and staging. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has been proposed as a modality that may address these needs. The potential clinical uses of MR imaging are defined in terms of clinical needs and technologic requirements. Applications of MR imaging in detection of breast lesions can be divided into two major approaches based on the clinical questions to be answered: (a) improved specificity and (b) improved sensitivity. These approaches are defined by specific sets of clinical needs and have substantially different technologic requirements. The specificity approach is used to reduce the number of biopsies performed to confirm false-positive mammographic findings. The MR imaging device that is used to improve specificity must visualize only the lesions that are seen mammographically. The sensitivity approach requires the visualization of lesions not identified at mammography, so that breast disease can be more effectively staged for treatment. The technologic requirements for the sensitivity approach are considerably more rigorous because all lesions must be identified. The advantages and disadvantages of each of these approaches and the potential clinical ramifications are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8428095     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880030139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  4 in total

1.  Combination of low and high resolution sequences in two orientations for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: more than a compromise.

Authors:  Toni W Vomweg; Andrea Teifke; R Peter Kunz; Christian Hintze; Alexander Hlawatsch; Annett Kern; Karl F Kreitner; Manfred Thelen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Predictive value of the time-intensity curves on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for lymphatic spreading in breast cancer.

Authors:  Shuhei Komatsu; Chol Joo Lee; Daisuke Ichikawa; Takashi Hamashima; Noriaki Morofuji; Koichi Shirono; Yohei Hosokawa; Harumi Okabe; Hideaki Kurioka; Hisakazu Yamagishi; Takahiro Oka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Conventional galactography and MR contrast galactography for diagnosing nipple discharge: preliminary results.

Authors:  Cüneyt Yücesoy; Emine Oztürk; Yusuf Ozer; Tahsin Edgüer; Baki Hekimoglu
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography.

Authors:  S Malur; S Wurdinger; A Moritz; W Michels; A Schneider
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2000-11-02       Impact factor: 6.466

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.