Literature DB >> 8426004

Echocardiographic description of the CarboMedics bileaflet prosthetic heart valve.

J Chambers1, J Cross, P Deverall, E Sowton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the echocardiographic appearance of the normal CarboMedics prosthesis in the aortic and mitral positions.
BACKGROUND: Echocardiography is the standard method of assessing prosthetic valves. However, new valve designs may still be marketed without an accompanying echocardiographic description. The CarboMedics prosthesis is in widespread use, but few noninvasive hemodynamic data have been published.
METHODS: Echocardiography was performed in 147 patients with a total of 96 normally functioning CarboMedics prostheses in the aortic position and 75 in the mitral position; in 24 patients, valves were implanted in both positions. The following variables were measured: peak and mean transvalvular velocities, peak and mean instantaneous gradient estimated from the modified Bernoulli equation, aortic acceleration slope, pressure half-time, transvalvular flow and effective orifice area using the continuity equation. Patterns of regurgitation were observed by transthoracic study in all valves and by transesophageal study in selected mitral valve prostheses.
RESULTS: For the aortic valve prostheses, estimated mean gradient ranged between 6 and 19 mm Hg. Effective area differed markedly among the anulus diameters (p < 0.001), with a mean value of 1 cm2 for the 19-mm valve and 2.6 cm2 for the 29-mm valve. For the mitral valve prostheses, mean gradient ranged from 3 to 7 mm Hg. There were a total of four washing leaks, one on either side of each pivotal point, and these lasted throughout systole or diastole. One jet was commonly more prominent than the other three.
CONCLUSIONS: The CarboMedics prosthesis offered relatively little resistance to forward flow except at small anulus diameters. The washing jets were prominent and would be easy to misdiagnose as a sign of paraprosthetic regurgitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8426004     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90681-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  8 in total

Review 1.  An introduction to transoesophageal echocardiography: II. Clinical applications.

Authors:  D Oxorn; G Edelist; M S Smith
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Echocardiographic assessment of artificial heart valves: British Society of Echocardiography position paper.

Authors:  J Chambers; A Fraser; P Lawford; P Nihoyannopoulos; I Simpson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-04

3.  Patient-prosthesis mismatch in the mitral position affects midterm survival and functional status.

Authors:  Denis Bouchard; Frédéric Vanden Eynden; Philippe Demers; Louis P Perrault; Michel Carrier; Raymond Cartier; Arsène J Basmadjian; Michel Pellerin
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Haemodynamic performance of aortic pericardial bioprostheses and bileaflet prostheses at rest and during exercise: implications for the surgical management of patients with small aortic roots.

Authors:  J R González-Juanatey; M V Fernández; F G Sampedro; J M García-Acuña; J B García-Bengoechea; A A Cendon; M G de La Peña
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Diagnostic evaluation of left-sided prosthetic heart valve dysfunction.

Authors:  Jesse Habets; Ricardo P Budde; Petr Symersky; Renee B van den Brink; Bas A de Mol; Willem P Mali; Lex A van Herwerden; Steven A Chamuleau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Factors determining patient-prosthesis mismatch after aortic valve replacement--a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Diana Bonderman; Alexandra Graf; Andreas A Kammerlander; Alfred Kocher; Guenter Laufer; Irene M Lang; Julia Mascherbauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch in Contemporary Small-Size Mechanical Prostheses Does Not Impact Survival at 10 Years.

Authors:  Horea Feier; Mihaela Mocan; Andrei Grigorescu; Lucian Falnita; Marian Gaspar; Constantin-Tudor Luca
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-01-31

8.  Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on 30-day outcomes in young and middle-aged patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Juan C Llosa; Rocío Díaz; Zain Khalpey; Carlos Morales; Rubén Álvarez; Jose López; Francisco Boye
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 1.637

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.