Literature DB >> 8425339

Cementless revision total knee arthroplasty.

L A Whiteside1.   

Abstract

This is a report of the outcome of cementless revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and describes the technique for bone grafting of massive femoral and tibial defects. The technique relies on rigid fixation of the implants using the remaining shell of distal femur and proximal tibia and the diaphysis of each bone for support of the implant. Fifty-six cementless revision TKAs in 56 patients were performed using cementless technique, long-stemmed components, and morselized allograft between April 1985 and April 1989. All knees had major loss of femoral and tibial bone stock. Fixation of the stemmed implants required firm seating on the rim of the femur and tibia. The stem engaged the isthmus of the bone to provide toggle control, and the screws fixed the implant firmly to bone. Two years after surgery, 30 (54%) of the patients had no pain, 17 (30%) had mild pain, five (9%) had moderate pain, and four (7%) had severe pain. All 56 knees had increasing radiodensity in the grafted areas one and two years postoperatively as compared with the one-month roentgenogram. All implants except two achieved stable fixation to bone. Alignment, stability, and comfort of the knee were all improved with cementless revision technique. The overall results of this study are encouraging. Bone stock was reliably reconstructed, and fixation during the short term appears to be durable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8425339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  9 in total

Review 1.  Fixation of revision TKA: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Beckmann; C Lüring; R Springorum; F X Köck; J Grifka; M Tingart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Modified hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA is durable at 2 to 10 years.

Authors:  Alexander P Sah; Sanjai Shukla; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Defect Reconstruction in Total Knee Arthroplasty with wedges and blocks]. [Corrected].

Authors:  R Hube; T Pfitzner; P von Roth; H O Mayr
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Revision total knee arthroplasty for major osteolysis.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; James A Keeney; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2009

5.  Current techniques in total knee replacement: results of a national survey.

Authors:  A M Phillips; N J Goddard; J E Tomlinson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Poorer survival after a primary implant during revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marrigje F Meijer; Inge H F Reininga; Alexander L Boerboom; Martin Stevens; Sjoerd K Bulstra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Cementless revision TKA with bone grafting of osseous defects restores bone stock with a low revision rate at 4 to 10 years.

Authors:  S A Hanna; W J S Aston; N J de Roeck; A Gough-Palmer; D P Powles
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior stabilized, condylar constrained or fully constrained prosthesis: a minimum 2-year follow-up analysis.

Authors:  Sun-Chul Hwang; Jae-Yeon Kong; Dae-Cheol Nam; Dong-Hee Kim; Hyung-Bin Park; Soon-Taek Jeong; Se-Hyun Cho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-05-04

9.  The influence of computer-assisted surgery on rotational, coronal and sagittal alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marrigje F Meijer; Martin Stevens; Alexander L Boerboom; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Inge Hf Reininga
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.