Literature DB >> 2154942

A new technique for sutureless intestinal anastomosis. A prospective, randomized, clinical trial.

D L Dyess1, P W Curreri, J J Ferrara.   

Abstract

A polyglycolic acid device has been designed for the performance of sutureless colonic anastomoses. The use of this biofragmentable anastomosis ring (BAR) was compared with conventional techniques in a prospective, randomized study of 59 patients (x age, 49 years) undergoing ileocolostomy (n = 23) or colocolostomy (n = 36). The anastomotic technique was determined at surgery by randomization (BAR, 27 patients; suture, 16 patients; staple, 16 patients). Performance of an anastomosis with the BAR required an average of 22 minutes, a stapled anastomosis required 33 minutes, and the suture technique required 37 minutes. Learning curve error contributed to the six intraoperative complications that occurred with performance of the anastomosis (BAR, three; end-to-end anastomosis [EEA] instrument, three). The two postoperative deaths were unrelated to the anastomosis. Length of hospitalization in uncomplicated patients was the same among the three groups. The 17 patients with prolonged hospitalization had complications unrelated to anastomotic technique. All patients were followed for a minimum of 6 weeks; no additional complications were identified. We concluded that 1) the BAR is a rapid, safe method for performance of sutureless anastomoses; 2) perioperative mortality and morbidity rates of the BAR are comparable to conventional techniques of suture and staple; and 3) long-term follow-up of BAR patients is warranted to determine the incidence of complications, such as structure and/or stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2154942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  7 in total

1.  Revisiting the biofragmentable anastomotic ring: is it safe in colonic surgery?

Authors:  Gabriela A Ghitulescu; Nancy Morin; Prasad Jetty; Paul Belliveau
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  A simple technique for sutureless very low colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  M Bezzi; M Casella; M Batori; L Angelini
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Compression versus hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  A A P Slesser; G Pellino; O Shariq; D Cocker; C Kontovounisios; S Rasheed; P P Tekkis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques.

Authors:  Jana Steger; Alissa Jell; Stefanie Ficht; Daniel Ostler; Markus Eblenkamp; Petra Mela; Dirk Wilhelm
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.755

5.  Small bowel anastomosis with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring and manual suture: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  R Gullichsen; J Ovaska; A Rantala; T Havia
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Sutureless anastomosis using a biofragmentable anastomosis ring.

Authors:  F Konishi; Y Saito; H Ugajin; M Okada; H Kashiwagi; T Sato; K Kanazawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Murphy's Button revisited. Clinical experience with the biofragmentable anastomotic ring.

Authors:  K A Forde; A J McLarty; J Tsai; K Ghalili; H M Delany
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 12.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.