Literature DB >> 8424512

A measure of intraoperative attention to monitor displays.

R G Loeb1.   

Abstract

Vigilance is an important but difficult to measure attribute in anesthesia practitioners. We present a modified standard method to assess intraoperative vigilance toward electronic data displays. The response time to detect a simulated abnormal value on the physiologic monitor was measured. Eight anesthesia residents were studied during 60 surgical procedures. Responses to 439 abnormal values were analyzed. The average response time was 61 +/- 61 s (mean +/- SD), and 56% of the detections were made within 60 s. However, 16% of the abnormal values were undetected during the 5 min that they were displayed. Response times and the rate of missed events were greater during induction of anesthesia (a time of high workload) than during the maintenance or emergence phases of anesthesia. Response times were shorter during procedures on ASA 1 patients than on ASA 3 patients. The results suggest that anesthesiologists usually quickly detect abnormal values on physiologic monitors and that less attention is devoted to monitors during periods of high workload.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8424512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  9 in total

1.  The employment of an iterative design process to develop a pulmonary graphical display.

Authors:  S Blake Wachter; Jim Agutter; Noah Syroid; Frank Drews; Matthew B Weinger; Dwayne Westenskow
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  [Effects of intraoperative reading : Impact on vigilance and workload].

Authors:  A Walther; K Wollmann; A Rapp; A R Heller
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Technologies and solutions for data display in the operating room.

Authors:  Noemi Bitterman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Reducing post analytical error: perspectives on new formats for the blood sciences pathology report.

Authors:  John D O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2015-02

5.  Do higher alarm thresholds for arterial blood pressure lead to less perioperative hypotension? A retrospective, observational cohort study.

Authors:  Agnes S Meidert; Roman Hornung; Tina Christmann; Elisa Aue; Chetana Dahal; Michael E Dolch; Josef Briegel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Effects of divided attention and operating room noise on perception of pulse oximeter pitch changes: a laboratory study.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Joseph J Schlesinger; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Manual record keeping is not necessary for anesthesia vigilance.

Authors:  R G Loeb
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1995-01

Review 8.  Patient monitoring alarms in the ICU and in the operating room.

Authors:  Felix Schmid; Matthias S Goepfert; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Treatment of intraoperative hypotension with cafedrine/theodrenaline versus ephedrine : A prospective, national, multicenter, non-interventional study-the HYPOTENS trial.

Authors:  L Eberhart; G Geldner; A Kowark; T-P Zucker; S Kreuer; M Przemeck; S Huljic; T Koch; T Keller; S Weber; P Kranke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 1.041

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.