Literature DB >> 25944968

Reducing post analytical error: perspectives on new formats for the blood sciences pathology report.

John D O'Connor1.   

Abstract

Little has changed in the way we report pathology results from blood sciences over the last 50 years other than moving to electronic display from paper. In part, this is aspiration to preserve the format of a paper report in electronic format. It is also due to the limitations of electronic media to display the data. The advancement of web-based technologies and functionality of hand-held devices together with wireless and other technologies afford the opportunity to rethink data presentation with the aim of emphasising the message in the data, thereby modifying clinical behaviours and potentially reducing post-analytical error. This article takes the form of a commentary which explores new developments in the field of infographics and, together with examples, suggests some new approaches to communicating what is currently just data into information. The combination of graphics and a new approach to provocative interpretative commenting offers a powerful tool in improving pathology utilisation. An additional challenge is the requirement to consider how pathology reports may be issued directly to patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 25944968      PMCID: PMC4402949     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev        ISSN: 0159-8090


  14 in total

1.  Is the medical undergraduate curriculum 'fit for purpose'?

Authors:  Danielle B Freedman
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.057

2.  Do interpretative comments influence patient management and do our users approve of the laboratory 'adding on' requests? A follow-up General Practitioner and Nurse Practitioner survey.

Authors:  Ian M Barlow
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.057

3.  Filling the gaps in undergraduate teaching of clinical biochemistry.

Authors:  Trevor A Gray; Alia El-Kadiki
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  A national survey of interpretative reporting in the UK.

Authors:  Eric S Kilpatrick; Danielle B Freedman
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.057

Review 5.  Human factors in accidents.

Authors:  M F Allnutt
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  A measure of intraoperative attention to monitor displays.

Authors:  R G Loeb
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Graphical summary of patient status.

Authors:  S M Powsner; E R Tufte
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-08-06       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine.

Authors:  Mario Plebani
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.057

9.  An analysis of major errors and equipment failures in anesthesia management: considerations for prevention and detection.

Authors:  J B Cooper; R S Newbower; R J Kitz
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Quality assessment of interpretative commenting in clinical chemistry.

Authors:  Ee Mun Lim; Ken A Sikaris; Janice Gill; John Calleja; Peter E Hickman; John Beilby; Samuel D Vasikaran
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of continuous quality improvement of tuberculosis and HIV diagnostic services in Amhara Public Health Institute, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Melashu Balew Shiferaw; Abay Sisay Misganaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.