Literature DB >> 8423263

Interaural temporal discrimination using two sinusoidally amplitude-modulated, high-frequency tones: conditions of summation and interference.

T N Buell1, C Trahiotis.   

Abstract

This paper concerns sensitivity to interaural temporal delays (ITD) in the envelopes of two, sometimes simultaneously presented, sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones. The SAM tones were fully modulated (typically at a rate of 250 Hz) and had carrier frequencies of either 2 or 4 kHz. Of particular interest were cases in which the delay to be detected (target ITD) occurred in only one spectral region or in both. The reference ITD, to which the target ITD was added, was either 0, 300, or 600 microseconds. There were three general outcomes: (1) When both regions contained a target ITD, there was an improvement in sensitivity that was quantitatively consistent with an optimal use of independent information. This type of summation was seen even when the target ITDs were added to a pair of SAM tones with two different reference ITDs; (2) when the target ITD was restricted to the higher spectral region, sensitivity was reduced, indicating interference. Interference occurred when the two spectral regions had the same or different reference ITDs and the same or different rates of modulation; (3) sensitivity was unaffected (i.e., no interference occurred) when the target ITD was restricted to the lower spectral region of the pair of SAM tones. These results supplement the observations of Buell and Hafter [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90, 1894-1900 (1991)], who used low-frequency tones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8423263     DOI: 10.1121/1.405628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Binaural interference in lateralization thresholds for interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Laurie M Heller; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Binaural interference in the free field.

Authors:  Naomi B H Croghan; D Wesley Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Katharina Egger; Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-16

4.  Measures of extents of laterality for high-frequency "transposed" stimuli under conditions of binaural interference.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Observer weighting of interaural delays in filtered impulses.

Authors:  K Saberi
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-10

6.  Binaural interference with simulated electric acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Chantal van Ginkel; René H Gifford; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spectrotemporal weighting of binaural cues: Effects of a diotic interferer on discrimination of dynamic interaural differences.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Bibee; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of center frequency and rate on the sensitivity to interaural delay in high-frequency click trains.

Authors:  Piotr Majdak; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.