Literature DB >> 8423262

Frequency discrimination in noise: comparison of cat performances with auditory-nerve models.

R D Hienz1, M B Sachs, C M Aleszczyk.   

Abstract

Pure-tone frequency discrimination (delta F) performances were measured in cats and compared to neural models of these delta F performances based on auditory-nerve data in cats. Animal psychophysical techniques were used to train cats to discriminate frequency changes for pulsed pure tones in background noise at both 1.0 and 3.0 kHz. A go-left, go-right procedure was employed, and delta F's were measured in noise as a function of signal level at a constant signal-to-noise ratio. In contrast to human listeners, cats showed increases in delta F at 1.0 kHz with increasing signal level. Model estimates of delta F's based on rate responses in the cat auditory nerve predict increasing delta F with increasing signal level, the trend observed in the cat psychophysical data. Model estimates of delta F's based on temporal (phase-locking) properties in cat auditory nerve, on the other hand, predict decreases in delta F that have been observed in previous data from human listeners [Dye and Hafter, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 1746-1753 (1980)]. These results suggest that for cats, average rate, rather than phase-locking, may be used by the central nervous system in performing frequency discrimination in background noise at 1.0 kHz. At 3.0 kHz cats showed little change in delta F as a function of signal level, a result similar to the trend for human listeners to show no change or slight increases in delta F with increases in signal level for tones in the 2- to 3-kHz range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8423262     DOI: 10.1121/1.405626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Spectral plasticity in monkey primary auditory cortex limits performance generalization in a temporal discrimination task.

Authors:  Ralph E Beitel; Christoph E Schreiner; Maike Vollmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Vowel Formant Frequency Discrimination in Cats: Comparison of Auditory Nerve Representations and Psychophysical Thresholds.

Authors:  Bradford J May; Aileen Huang; Glenn LE Prell; Robert D Hienz
Journal:  Audit Neurosci       Date:  1996-04-24

4.  Tone-Evoked Acoustic Change Complex (ACC) Recorded in a Sedated Animal Model.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-10

Review 5.  Across-channel timing differences as a potential code for the frequency of pure tones.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Long; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-08

6.  Pitch perception at very high frequencies: On psychometric functions and integration of frequency information.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Brian C J Moore; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.482

Review 7.  Neural and behavioral investigations into timbre perception.

Authors:  Stephen M Town; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.