Literature DB >> 8421315

Effects of a single base-pair deletion in the bacteriophage lambda PRM promoter. Repression of PRM by repressor bound at OR2 and by RNA polymerase bound at PR.

S T Woody1, R S Fong, G N Gussin.   

Abstract

We have deleted a single base-pair in the -35 region of the bacteriophage lambda PRM promoter. The deletion (PRM delta 34) creates a better match of PRM to consensus, thereby substantially increasing the activity of the promoter in vitro and in vivo. Since the mutation also increases the overlap between OR2 and the -35 region of PRM, binding of repressor to OR2 no longer activates, but in fact represses PRM. Finally, the mutation decreases the distance between the PRM and PR transcription start sites from 82 to 81 base-pairs. As a consequence, the interaction of RNA polymerase with either promoter in vitro strongly inhibits open complex formation at the other. Kinetic analyses and DNase I protection assays lead to the surprising result that mutual inhibition is not due to steric occlusion. Both promoters can be occupied by RNA polymerase at the same time. Determination of KB and kf revealed that inhibition of PRM delta 34 by PR was manifest in a 100-fold decrease in the value of kf, but at the same time KB was increased tenfold. These data raise the possibility that RNA polymerase molecules bound at the two promoters contact and mutually stabilize each other and that this interaction subsequently inhibits a substep in the isomerization of closed to open complexes. In footprinting assays, each promoter is characterized by sites of enhanced cleavage when that promoter is occupied alone. These enhancements are substantially diminished when both promoters are occupied, suggesting that complexes of each promoter with RNA polymerase alter the structure of complexes formed at the other promoter. Assays of the effects of the delta 34 mutation in vivo indicate that interference between PRM and PR does not limit the rate of open complex formation at PRM in the cell. Apparently, transcription initiation clears the promoter rapidly enough that neither promoter is occupied a significant fraction of the time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8421315     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  14 in total

1.  Cooperative action of the catabolite activator protein and AraC in vitro at the araFGH promoter.

Authors:  C M Johnson; R F Schleif
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Mutually exclusive utilization of P(R) and P(RM) promoters in bacteriophage 434 O(R).

Authors:  J Xu; G B Koudelka
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Promoter interference in a bacteriophage lambda control region: effects of a range of interpromoter distances.

Authors:  M G Strainic; J J Sullivan; J Collado-Vides; P L deHaseth
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Interactions among CII protein, RNA polymerase and the lambda PRE promoter: contacts between RNA polymerase and the -35 region of PRE are identical in the presence and absence of CII protein.

Authors:  Michael T Marr; Jeffrey W Roberts; Susan E Brown; Matthew Klee; Gary N Gussin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Sequence tolerance of the phage lambda PRM promoter: implications for evolution of gene regulatory circuitry.

Authors:  Christine B Michalowski; Megan D Short; John W Little
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Evidence that the promoter can influence assembly of antitermination complexes at downstream RNA sites.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Ting Shi; Mark A Mozola; Eric R Olson; Karla Henthorn; Susan Brown; Gary N Gussin; David I Friedman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  The lysis-lysogeny decision of bacteriophage 933W: a 933W repressor-mediated long-distance loop has no role in regulating 933W P(RM) activity.

Authors:  Tammy J Bullwinkle; Gerald B Koudelka
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  The glutamic acid residue at amino acid 261 of the alpha subunit is a determinant of the intrinsic efficiency of RNA polymerase at the metE core promoter in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S Jafri; M L Urbanowski; G V Stauffer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Upstream interactions at the lambda pRM promoter are sequence nonspecific and activate the promoter to a lesser extent than an introduced UP element of an rRNA promoter.

Authors:  Y Tang; K Murakami; A Ishihama; P L deHaseth
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  New Insights into the Phage Genetic Switch: Effects of Bacteriophage Lambda Operator Mutations on DNA Looping and Regulation of PR, PL, and PRM.

Authors:  Dale E A Lewis; Gary N Gussin; Sankar Adhya
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.