Literature DB >> 10809696

Mutually exclusive utilization of P(R) and P(RM) promoters in bacteriophage 434 O(R).

J Xu1, G B Koudelka.   

Abstract

Establishment and maintenance of a lysogen of the lambdoid bacteriophage 434 require that the 434 repressor both activate transcription from the P(RM) promoter and repress transcription from the divergent P(R) promoter. Several lines of evidence indicate that the 434 repressor activates initiation of P(RM) transcription by occupying a binding site adjacent to the P(RM) promoter and directly contacting RNA polymerase. The overlapping architecture of the P(RM) and P(R) promoters suggests that an RNA polymerase bound at P(R) may repress P(RM) transcription initiation. Hence, part of the stimulatory effect of the 434 repressor may be relief of interference between RNA polymerase binding to the P(RM) promoter and to the P(R) promoter. Consistent with this proposal, we show that the repressor cannot activate P(RM) transcription if RNA polymerase binds at P(R) prior to addition of the 434 repressor. However, unlike the findings with the related lambda phage, formation of RNA polymerase promoter complexes at P(RM) and at P(R) apparently are mutually exclusive. We find that the RNA polymerase-mediated inhibition of repressor-stimulated P(RM) transcription requires the presence of an open complex at P(R). Taken together, these results indicate that establishment of an open complex at P(R) directly prevents formation of an RNA polymerase-P(RM) complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10809696      PMCID: PMC94503          DOI: 10.1128/JB.182.11.3165-3174.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  26 in total

1.  Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins.

Authors:  F JACOB; J MONOD
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1961-06       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  A general and fast method to generate multiple site directed mutations.

Authors:  I Mikaelian; A Sergeant
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  lac repressor acts by modifying the initial transcribing complex so that it cannot leave the promoter.

Authors:  J Lee; A Goldfarb
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-08-23       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  DNA-based positive control mutants in the binding site sequence of 434 repressor.

Authors:  J Xu; G B Koudelka
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-09-11       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Activation and repression of transcription by differential contact: two sides of a coin.

Authors:  S Roy; S Garges; S Adhya
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Oriented DNA binding by one-armed lambda repressor heterodimers and contacts between repressor and RNA polymerase at P(RM).

Authors:  Y I Kim; J C Hu
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.501

7.  Activation of prokaryotic transcription through arbitrary protein-protein contacts.

Authors:  S L Dove; J K Joung; A Hochschild
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Transcription activation and repression by interaction of a regulator with the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase: the model of phage phi 29 protein p4.

Authors:  F Rojo; M Mencía; M Monsalve; M Salas
Journal:  Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol       Date:  1998

9.  Effects of a single base-pair deletion in the bacteriophage lambda PRM promoter. Repression of PRM by repressor bound at OR2 and by RNA polymerase bound at PR.

Authors:  S T Woody; R S Fong; G N Gussin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-01-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 10.  E. coli RNA polymerase interacts homologously with two different promoters.

Authors:  U Siebenlist; R B Simpson; W Gilbert
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  5 in total

1.  Molecular flip-flops formed by overlapping Fis sites.

Authors:  Paul N Hengen; Ilya G Lyakhov; Lisa E Stewart; Thomas D Schneider
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Purification and characterization of the repressor of the shiga toxin-encoding bacteriophage 933W: DNA binding, gene regulation, and autocleavage.

Authors:  Astrid P Koudelka; Lisa A Hufnagel; Gerald B Koudelka
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Transcriptional interference--a crash course.

Authors:  Keith E Shearwin; Benjamin P Callen; J Barry Egan
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Cis-Antisense Transcription Gives Rise to Tunable Genetic Switch Behavior: A Mathematical Modeling Approach.

Authors:  Antoni E Bordoy; Anushree Chatterjee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mechanisms that Determine the Differential Stability of Stx⁺ and Stx(-) Lysogens.

Authors:  Michael P Colon; Dolonchapa Chakraborty; Yonatan Pevzner; Gerald B Koudelka
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.