Literature DB >> 27670714

New Insights into the Phage Genetic Switch: Effects of Bacteriophage Lambda Operator Mutations on DNA Looping and Regulation of PR, PL, and PRM.

Dale E A Lewis1, Gary N Gussin2, Sankar Adhya3.   

Abstract

One of the best understood systems in genetic regulatory biology is the so-called "genetic switch" that determines the choice the phage-encoded CI repressor binds cooperatively to tripartite operators, OL and OR, in a defined pattern, thus blocking the transcription at two lytic promoters, PL and PR, and auto-regulating the promoter, PRM, which directs CI synthesis by the prophage. Fine-tuning of the maintenance of lysogeny is facilitated by interactions between CI dimers bound to OR and OL through the formation of a loop by the intervening DNA segment. By using a purified in vitro transcription system, we have genetically dissected the roles of individual operator sites in the formation of the DNA loop and thus have gained several new and unexpected insights into the system. First, although both OR and OL are tripartite, the presence of only a single active CI binding site in one of the two operators is sufficient for DNA loop formation. Second, in PL, unlike in PR, the promoter distal operator site, OL3, is sufficient to directly repress PL. Third, DNA looping mediated by the formation of CI octamers arising through the interaction of pairs of dimers bound to adjacent operator sites in OR and OL does not require OR and OL to be aligned "in register", that is, CI bound to "out-of-register" sub-operators, for example, OL1~Ol2 and OR2~OR3, can also mediate loop formation. Finally, based on an examination of the mechanism of activation of PRM when only OR1 or OR2 are wild type, we hypothesize that RNA polymerase bound at PR interferes with DNA loop formation. Thus, the formation of DNA loops involves potential interactions between proteins bound at numerous cis-acting sites, which therefore very subtly contribute to the regulation of the "switch".
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CI repressor; DNA looping; genetic switch; prophage lambda; transcription

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27670714      PMCID: PMC7757127          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  47 in total

1.  Four dimers of lambda repressor bound to two suitably spaced pairs of lambda operators form octamers and DNA loops over large distances.

Authors:  B Révet; B von Wilcken-Bergmann; H Bessert; A Barker; B Müller-Hill
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1999-02-11       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Cooperativity in long-range gene regulation by the lambda CI repressor.

Authors:  Ian B Dodd; Keith E Shearwin; Alison J Perkins; Tom Burr; Ann Hochschild; J Barry Egan
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Multilevel autoregulation of λ repressor protein CI by DNA looping in vitro.

Authors:  Dale Lewis; Phuoc Le; Chiara Zurla; Laura Finzi; Sankar Adhya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  DNA loops induced by cooperative binding of lambda repressor.

Authors:  J Griffith; A Hochschild; M Ptashne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Aug 21-27       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Effects of a single base-pair deletion in the bacteriophage lambda PRM promoter. Repression of PRM by repressor bound at OR2 and by RNA polymerase bound at PR.

Authors:  S T Woody; R S Fong; G N Gussin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-01-05       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Differential binding of RNA polymerase to the pRM and pR promoters of bacteriophage lambda.

Authors:  E M Owens; G N Gussin
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  The effect of a lambda repressor mutation on the activation of transcription initiation from the lambda PRM promoter.

Authors:  D K Hawley; W R McClure
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Gene regulation at the right operator (OR) of bacteriophage lambda. II. OR1, OR2, and OR3: their roles in mediating the effects of repressor and cro.

Authors:  B J Meyer; R Maurer; M Ptashne
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1980-05-15       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  lambda Repressor and cro--components of an efficient molecular switch.

Authors:  A D Johnson; A R Poteete; G Lauer; R T Sauer; G K Ackers; M Ptashne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-11-19       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Direct demonstration and quantification of long-range DNA looping by the lambda bacteriophage repressor.

Authors:  Chiara Zurla; Carlo Manzo; David Dunlap; Dale E A Lewis; Sankar Adhya; Laura Finzi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

1.  Bacteriophage λ RexA and RexB functions assist the transition from lysogeny to lytic growth.

Authors:  Lynn C Thomason; Carl J Schiltz; Carolyn Court; Christopher J Hosford; Myfanwy C Adams; Joshua S Chappie; Donald L Court
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.979

2.  The Developmental Switch in Bacteriophage λ: A Critical Role of the Cro Protein.

Authors:  Sangmi Lee; Dale E A Lewis; Sankar Adhya
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  The pre-induction temperature affects recombinant HuGM-CSF aggregation in thermoinducible Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sara Restrepo-Pineda; Nuria Sánchez-Puig; Néstor O Pérez; Enrique García-Hernández; Norma A Valdez-Cruz; Mauricio A Trujillo-Roldán
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.560

4.  Evolutionary Stabilization of Cooperative Toxin Production through a Bacterium-Plasmid-Phage Interplay.

Authors:  Johannes Müller; Bärbel Stecher; Stefanie Spriewald; Eva Stadler; Burkhard A Hense; Philipp C Münch; Alice C McHardy; Anna S Weiss; Nancy Obeng
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 7.867

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.