Literature DB >> 8420883

Portal film enhancement: technique and clinical utility.

J Rosenman1, C A Roe, R Cromartie, K E Muller, S M Pizer.   

Abstract

We report on the results a 3-year project which had as its goal the development of methods to enhance radiation portal films to improve their readability. We had previously reported on a portal film enhancement technique, contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization, which could enhance low contrast detail, but degraded sharply contrasted edges. A new method, unsharp masking followed by contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization, now appears to overcome this problem. A clinical trial to test whether enhanced portal films could be read more accurately than standard ones was undertaken. The trial involved 12 readers from two institutions doing 276 readings. In this trial the enhanced films were judged to be of higher quality than the non-enhanced films (p < .001) and were read more accurately (p = .026). The usefulness and difficulties of routinely performing portal film enhancement in a busy radiation therapy department are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8420883     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90357-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

1.  Soft copy display requirements for digital mammography.

Authors:  Bradley M Hemminger
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms.

Authors:  E D Pisano; S Zong; B M Hemminger; M DeLuca; R E Johnston; K Muller; M P Braeuning; S M Pizer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  [Monitor assessment of digitalized and post-processed portal films compared to conventional films presented on a light box].

Authors:  S Wachter; N Gerstner; A Colotto; A Battmann; A Gahleitner; U Haverkamp; R Pötter
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  The effect of intensity windowing on the detection of simulated masses embedded in dense portions of digitized mammograms in a laboratory setting.

Authors:  E D Pisano; J Chandramouli; B M Hemminger; D Glueck; R E Johnston; K Muller; M P Braeuning; D Puff; W Garrett; S Pizer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Acceptability and usage patterns of an image analysis workstation.

Authors:  A A Boxwala; C P Friedman; D S Fritsch; J G Rosenman; E L Chaney
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997

6.  Does intensity windowing improve the detection of simulated calcifications in dense mammograms?

Authors:  E D Pisano; J Chandramouli; B M Hemminger; M DeLuca; D Glueck; R E Johnston; K Muller; M P Braeuning; S Pizer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Verifying radiotherapy treatment setup by interactive image registration.

Authors:  A A Boxwala; E L Chaney; C P Friedman
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1996

8.  Automatic x-ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto-optimization.

Authors:  Jianfeng Qiu; H Harold Li; Tiezhi Zhang; Fangfang Ma; Deshan Yang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Enhancement of megavoltage electronic portal images for markerless tumor tracking.

Authors:  Kwang-Ho Cheong; Jai-Woong Yoon; Soah Park; Taejin Hwang; Sei-Kwon Kang; Taeryool Koo; Tae Jin Han; Haeyoung Kim; Me Yeon Lee; Kyoung Ju Kim; Hoonsik Bae
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.