Literature DB >> 8418343

Relationship between malpractice claims and cesarean delivery.

A R Localio1, A G Lawthers, J M Bengtson, L E Hebert, S L Weaver, T A Brennan, J R Landis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether an association exists between the probability of a cesarean delivery and the level of malpractice claims risk faced by hospitals and physicians.
DESIGN: Survey of computerized discharge data linked with physician and hospital malpractice claims records based on stratified, random sample of hospitals.
SETTING: Acute care hospitals in New York State in 1984. POPULATION: All deliveries (60 490) at 31 hospitals.
RESULTS: After controlling for the clinical risk of a cesarean delivery, patient socioeconomic status, and physician and hospital characteristics, cesarean delivery was positively associated with physician malpractice premiums (odds ratio [OR], 3.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.13 to 4.24 for the difference between upstate and New York City levels), with the number of physician claims opened per 100 physicians at the hospital level (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.30 for a 1-SD change), and with the number of hospital claims opened per 1000 discharges (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.43 for a 1-SD change). Measures of physician-perceived risk of suit also showed a significant association with cesarean delivery (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.53 to 2.52, upstate vs New York City). Within hospitals, there was no significant association (OR, 1.15; P = .126) between the odds of cesarean delivery and the claims history (none vs one or more) of an individual physician.
CONCLUSION: Results support previous speculations of a positive association between malpractice claims risk and the rate of cesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8418343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  36 in total

1.  Provider distribution and variations in statewide cesarean section rates.

Authors:  W J Hueston; S Lewis-Stevenson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2001-02

2.  Inter-hospital variations in caesarean sections. A risk adjusted comparison in the Valencia public hospitals.

Authors:  J Librero; S Peiró; S M Calderón
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  Act first and look up the law afterward?: medical malpractice and the ethics of defensive medicine.

Authors:  K De Ville
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1998-12

4.  The importance of negative defensive medicine in the effects of malpractice reform.

Authors:  Daniel Montanera
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-04-09

5.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

6.  The impact of state laws limiting malpractice damage awards on health care expenditures.

Authors:  Fred J Hellinger; William E Encinosa
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Impact of a cultural belief about ghost month on delivery mode in Taiwan.

Authors:  Herng-Ching Lin; Sudha Xirasagar; Yu-Chi Tung
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Malpractice liability costs and the practice of medicine in the Medicare program.

Authors:  Katherine Baicker; Elliott S Fisher; Amitabh Chandra
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Medical malpractice reform and employer-sponsored health insurance premiums.

Authors:  Michael A Morrisey; Meredith L Kilgore; Leonard Jack Nelson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  The impact of the active management of risk in pregnancy at term on birth outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Samuel Parry; Aaron B Caughey; Sarah Rosen; Allison Keen; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.