Literature DB >> 3610653

Timing of prenatal care in the United States: how accurate are our measurements?

J D Forrest, S Singh.   

Abstract

Timing of prenatal care has become the most widely used indicator of adequacy of care, largely because it is easy to measure and is obtained by national data collection sources. Because it is a crucial input into setting policy goals, it is important that we have an accurate measure of timing of care. This article reviews the existing level of access to prenatal care, as measured by three different national data sources (Vital Statistics, the National Natality Survey, and the National Survey of Family Growth). Differences among the three sources are discussed; and drawing upon what we know of the problems of data collection, we speculate on the most accurate measure of access to care. Finally, suggestions for improving future data collection are made.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3610653      PMCID: PMC1065433     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  2 in total

1.  Levels of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase in cultured skin fibroblasts from cystinotics and normals.

Authors:  B States; S Segal
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1980-11-24       Impact factor: 5.037

2.  The need for prenatal care in the United States: evidence from the 1980 National Natality Survey.

Authors:  S Singh; A Torres; J D Forrest
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1985 May-Jun
  2 in total
  6 in total

1.  The prevalence of low income among childbearing women in California: implications for the private and public sectors.

Authors:  P Braveman; S Egerter; K Marchi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Risk factors for late or no prenatal care following Medicaid expansions in California.

Authors:  M Nothnagle; K Marchi; S Egerter; P Braveman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-12

3.  Problems in estimating the number of women in need of subsidized prenatal care.

Authors:  P A Buescher; M D Peoples-Sheps; P A Guild; E Siegel
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  A comparison of prenatal care use in the United States and Europe.

Authors:  P Buekens; M Kotelchuck; B Blondel; F B Kristensen; J H Chen; G Masuy-Stroobant
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The quality of the new birth certificate data: a validation study in North Carolina.

Authors:  P A Buescher; K P Taylor; M H Davis; J M Bowling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.

Authors:  M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.308

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.