Literature DB >> 8416081

Tonotopic auditory cortex and the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) equivalent of the mismatch negativity.

H Tiitinen1, K Alho, M Huotilainen, R J Ilmoniemi, J Simola, R Näätänen.   

Abstract

Two tone stimuli, one frequent (standard) and the other infrequent (a slightly higher, deviant tone), were presented in random order and at short intervals to subjects reading texts they had selected. In different blocks, standards were either 250, 1,000, or 4,000 Hz, with the deviants always being 10% higher in frequency than the standards of the same blocks. Magnetic responses elicited by the standard and deviant tones included N1m, the magnetoencephalographic equivalent of the electrical N1 (its supratemporal component). In addition, deviant stimuli elicited MMNm, the magnetic equivalent of the electrical mismatch negativity, MMN. The equivalent dipole sources of the two responses were located in supratemporal auditory cortex, with the MMNm source being anterior to that of N1m. The dipole orientations of both sources in teh sagittal plane depended on stimulus frequency, suggesting that the responses are generated by tonotopically organized neuronal populations. The tonotopy reflected by the frequency dependence of the MMNm source might be that of the neural trace system underlying frequency representation of auditory stimuli in sensory memory.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8416081     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02078.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  18 in total

1.  Subdivisions of auditory cortex and processing streams in primates.

Authors:  J H Kaas; T A Hackett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Frequency change detection in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  P May; H Tiitinen; R J Ilmoniemi; G Nyman; J G Taylor; R Näätänen
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Tonotopic cortical representation of periodic complex sounds.

Authors:  Selene Cansino; Antoine Ducorps; Richard Ragot
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The effect of MR scanner noise on auditory cortex activity using fMRI.

Authors:  Carrie J Scarff; Joseph C Dort; Jos J Eggermont; Bradley G Goodyear
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Neuromagnetic evidence for a featural distinction of English consonants: sensor- and source-space data.

Authors:  Mathias Scharinger; Jennifer Merickel; Joshua Riley; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 6.  Mapping cognitive function.

Authors:  Steven M Stufflebeam; Bruce R Rosen
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Mismatch negativity: the contribution of differences in the refractoriness of stimulus-specific neuron populations.

Authors:  M D Evstigneeva; A A Aleksandrov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-10-15

8.  The analysis of simple and complex auditory signals in human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic evidence from M100 modulation.

Authors:  Julian Jenkins; William J Idsardi; David Poeppel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Mismatch negativity encoding of prediction errors predicts S-ketamine-induced cognitive impairments.

Authors:  André Schmidt; Rosilla Bachmann; Michael Kometer; Philipp A Csomor; Klaas E Stephan; Erich Seifritz; Franz X Vollenweider
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Mismatch negativity generation in the human 5HT2A agonist and NMDA antagonist model of psychosis.

Authors:  Karsten Heekeren; Jörg Daumann; Anna Neukirch; Carsten Stock; Wolfram Kawohl; Christine Norra; Till D Waberski; Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-05-18       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.