Literature DB >> 8414429

Revision total hip arthroplasty. Long-term results without cement.

J M Lawrence1, C A Engh, G E Macalino.   

Abstract

The authors present their results for cementless femoral revision arthroplasty using extensively porous coated implants. Patients have been prospectively followed for 5 to 11 years (mean 7.4 years). The revision rate was 5.7%, and the radiographic loosening rate was 1.1%, to give a mechanical failure rate of only 6.9%. As a result of the revision procedure, the pain level was improved for 89.1% of the patients, walking status was improved for 82.8% of the patients, and functional level was improved for 88.5% of the patients. These results compare very favorably with any reports on revision arthroplasty using cement with a similar length follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8414429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  10 in total

1.  Are short fully coated stems adequate for "simple" femoral revisions?

Authors:  Matthew W Tetreault; Sanjai K Shukla; Paul H Yi; Scott M Sporer; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  What is the survivorship of fully coated femoral components in revision hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Elizabeth S Soileau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Femoral revision with an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component.

Authors:  Lawrence V Gulotta; Andreas Baldini; Kristin Foote; Stephen Lyman; Bryan J Nestor
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-12-01

4.  Bone remodeling after a mean of 10 years in diaphyseal cortical defects repaired with femoral revision using bypass fixation of extensively porous-coated stems with high stiffness.

Authors:  Kiyokazu Fukui; Ayumi Kaneuji; Tanzo Sugimori; Toru Ichiseki; Tadami Matsumoto
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-01-04

5.  Revision arthroplasty with an isoelastic uncemented femoral stem.

Authors:  T J Niinimäki; J P Puranen; P K Jalovaara
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Femoral revision surgery using a fully hydroxyapatite-coated stem: a cohort study of twenty two to twenty seven years.

Authors:  Olav Reikerås
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  High medium-term survival of Zweymüller SLR-plus stem used in femoral revision.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Thomas Repantis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The course of radiographic loosening, pain and functional outcome around the first revision of a total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Emin Aghayev; Regula Teuscher; Michal Neukamp; Eu Jin Lee; Markus Melloh; Stefan Eggli; Christoph Röder
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  Outcomes of dual modular cementless femoral stems in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ali Ghoz; Matthew L Broadhead; John Morley; Shawn Tavares; David McDonald
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2014-03-31

10.  Fracture of Uncemented Revision Femoral Stems in three Arthroplasty Patients: A Case Series with three different brands.

Authors:  Rajiv Merchant; Ian Kelly; John Quinlan
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.