Literature DB >> 8411024

What young people think and do when the option for cystic fibrosis carrier testing is available.

J Mitchell1, C R Scriver, C L Clow, F Kaplan.   

Abstract

We report findings in phase II of a pilot study of cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening/testing by mutation analysis. Phase I has been reported elsewhere. Eligible participants in phase II (n = 815) were students (15 to 17 years of age) in public high schools. An educational component (exchange of information and discussion about common genetic disorders including CF) preceded, by one week or more, voluntary participation in the screening component which required a blood sample. The uptake rate for screening was 42%. Nine carriers (2pq = 0.0260) were identified, all with the delta F508 mutation; students were also tested for G551D, G542X, W1282X, and -549-mutations, but no carriers of these alleles were found. Carriers had positive views of the education and testing experiences. Persons identified as 'non-carriers' were also surveyed (n = 135, response rate 41%). As in phase I, the majority (83%) again understood that a negative DNA test had not excluded them from possible carrier status. Students who participated in the informational component but were not screened served here as controls in the follow up survey (n = 208, response rate 53%). Their views were similar to those of the screened non-carriers, and similar also to those held by students, adults, pregnant women, couples, and CF relatives in other communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8411024      PMCID: PMC1016451          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.30.7.538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  12 in total

1.  CONE DYSFUNCTION SYNDROMES.

Authors:  G GOODMAN; H RIPPS; I M SIEGEL
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1963-08

2.  Color matching and foveal densitometry in patients and carriers of an X-linked progressive cone dystrophy.

Authors:  J E Keunen; J A van Everdingen; L N Went; J A Oosterhuis; D van Norren
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-12

3.  X-linked cone dystrophy.

Authors:  C Verdoorn; A Pinckers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Dominant macular degenerations. The cone dystrophies.

Authors:  A E Krill; A F Deutman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Cone dystrophy, nyctalopia, and supernormal rod responses. A new retinal degeneration.

Authors:  P Gouras; H M Eggers; C J MacKay
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-05

6.  Densitometric measurement of human cone photopigment kinetics.

Authors:  V C Smith; J Pokorny; D van Norren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  A continuously recording retinal densitometer.

Authors:  D van Norren; J van der Kraats
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  An electroretinographic and molecular genetic study of X-linked cone degeneration.

Authors:  E Reichel; A M Bruce; M A Sandberg; E L Berson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-11-15       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  X-linked recessive cone dystrophy with tapetal-like sheen. A newly recognized entity with Mizuo-Nakamura phenomenon.

Authors:  J R Heckenlively; R G Weleber
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-09

10.  X-linked progressive cone dystrophy. Clinical characteristics of affected males and female carriers.

Authors:  D M Jacobson; H S Thompson; J A Bartley
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  17 in total

1.  Carrier testing of children for two X linked diseases in a family based setting: a retrospective long term psychosocial evaluation.

Authors:  O Järvinen; A M Aalto; A E Lehesjoki; M Lindlöf; I Söderling; A Uutela; H Kääriäinen
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 2.  Who should know about our genetic makeup and why?

Authors:  T Takala; H A Gylling
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-10

3.  Attitudes toward cystic fibrosis carrier and prenatal testing and utilization of carrier testing among relatives of individuals with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  DeeDee Lafayette; Dianne Abuelo; Mary Ann Passero; Umadevi Tantravahi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Attitudes of high school students toward carrier screening and prenatal diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Sharon J Durfy; Andrea Page; Barry Eng; Patricia L Chang; John S Waye
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A qualitative study exploring genetic counsellors' experiences of counselling children.

Authors:  Fiona Ulph; James Leong; Cris Glazebrook; Ellen Townsend
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Research issues in genetic testing of adolescents for obesity.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Pamela Sankar; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.110

7.  Cystic fibrosis carrier population screening in the primary care setting.

Authors:  S Loader; P Caldwell; A Kozyra; J C Levenkron; C D Boehm; H H Kazazian; P T Rowley
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Testing carrier status in siblings of patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  I Balfour-Lynn; S Madge; R Dinwiddie
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Attitudes towards bipolar disorder and predictive genetic testing among patients and providers.

Authors:  L B Smith; B Sapers; V I Reus; N B Freimer
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  Cystic fibrosis heterozygote screening in 5,161 pregnant women.

Authors:  D R Witt; C Schaefer; P Hallam; S Wi; B Blumberg; A Fishbach; J Holtzman; S Kornfeld; R Lee; L Nemzer; R Palmer
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.