Literature DB >> 8409848

Connecting goals and actions during reading.

J S Huitema1, S Dopkins, C M Klin, J L Myers.   

Abstract

Three experiments showed that reading about a character's actions can reactivate a goal of the character stated earlier in the passage and backgrounded by intervening material. Subjects were slower to read a line describing an action that was inconsistent with a goal of the protagonist than they were to read about an action that was consistent with the goal, even though both lines were locally coherent. Goals were reactivated even when the intervening material did not describe attempts to achieve the goal (Experiment 2) and when the intervening material described another goal of the protagonist (Experiment 3). The results suggest that reading a sentence can reactivate relevant information from earlier in the text, even when the sentence is coherent with its immediate context and the reactivated information has been backgrounded by several lines of unrelated text.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8409848     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.19.5.1053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  10 in total

1.  Perceptual components of situation models.

Authors:  R Fincher-Kiefer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

2.  Maintaining global coherence in reading: the role of sentence boundaries.

Authors:  A E Guzmán; C M Klin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

3.  Processing of temporal information: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Mike Rinck; Elena Gámez; José M Díaz; Manuel De Vega
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

4.  Slippery slope arguments imply opposition to change.

Authors:  Matthew Haigh; Jeffrey S Wood; Andrew J Stewart
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-07

5.  Suppression of Story Character Goals During Reading.

Authors:  Tracy Linderholm; Morton Ann Gernsbacher; Paul van den Broek; Lana Neninde; Rachel R W Robertson; Brian Sundermier
Journal:  Discourse Process       Date:  2004-01

6.  Text validation: Overlooking consistency effect discrepancies.

Authors:  Murray Singer; Jackie Spear; Maria Rodrigo-Tamarit
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-08-19

7.  Inferencing processes after right hemisphere brain damage: maintenance of inferences.

Authors:  Margaret Lehman Blake
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Inferencing processes after right hemisphere brain damage: effects of contextual bias.

Authors:  Margaret Lehman Blake
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Coherence formation during narrative text processing: a comparison between auditory and audiovisual text presentation in 9- to 12-year-old children.

Authors:  Wienke Wannagat; Gesine Waizenegger; Gerhild Nieding
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-01-06

10.  Cognitive load affects early processes involved in mentalizing robot behaviour.

Authors:  Nicolas Spatola; Serena Marchesi; Agnieszka Wykowska
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.996

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.