Literature DB >> 8408970

Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an interfering voice.

J M Festen1.   

Abstract

Two experiments are presented to explain the difference in speech-reception threshold (SRT) between conditions with a steady-state noise masker or an interfering voice. Literature shows for normal hearing a masking release of 6-8 dB with an interfering voice and a substantial reduction of this release with hearing impairment. In experiment I the possible role of comodulation masking release (CMR) is investigated by manipulating the comodulation in the interfering voice by the introduction of temporal shift among filter bands of various width. The spectral spread of masking from the manipulated interfering voice was controlled by interleaving the mutually shifted speech bands with 1/3-octave bands of noise. Although comodulation in the interfering speech appears to be very important for the low SRT, the contribution of across-frequency processing of masker fluctuations--commonly considered as the origin of CMR--is only 1.3 dB. In experiment II the level dependence of masking release with an interfering voice is investigated. The data fit in with the hypothesis by Festen and Plomp [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1725-1736 (1990)] that the release from masking with an interfering voice is limited by forward masking. It appears that up to about 55 dBA the release from masking increases with level up to about 7 dB. Above 55 dBA the difference in SRT obtained with a noise masker or an interfering voice is constant due to the limited average modulation depth of speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8408970     DOI: 10.1121/1.408156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Spatial release from masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners as a function of the temporal overlap of competing talkers.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Spectral integration under conditions of comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Masking release in temporally fluctuating noise depends on comodulation and overall level in Cope's gray treefrog.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Alejandro Vélez
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Masking release for words in amplitude-modulated noise as a function of modulation rate and task.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lisa N Whittle; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Evolutionary adaptations for the temporal processing of natural sounds by the anuran peripheral auditory system.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Kenneth Kragh Jensen; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Comodulation masking release in the inferior colliculus by combined signal enhancement and masker reduction.

Authors:  Jan-Philipp Diepenbrock; Marcus Jeschke; Frank W Ohl; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Frogs Exploit Statistical Regularities in Noisy Acoustic Scenes to Solve Cocktail-Party-like Problems.

Authors:  Norman Lee; Jessica L Ward; Alejandro Vélez; Christophe Micheyl; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 10.  The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.