Literature DB >> 8408155

Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with use of autogenous patellar-ligament grafts. Results after twenty-four to forty-two months.

D D Buss1, R F Warren, T L Wickiewicz, B J Galinat, R Panariello.   

Abstract

The results of the first sixty-nine consecutive patients who had had seventy arthroscopically assisted reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament with use of an autogenous patellar-ligament graft at our institution were reviewed retrospectively. Sixty-seven patients (sixty-eight knees) were available for evaluation after a minimum of two years. All patients had been managed with early, postoperative range-of-motion exercises and a standardized program of physical therapy. At the time of the most recent follow-up evaluation, the median ligament score, according to the rating system of The Hospital for Special Surgery, was 93 of a possible 100 points. Of the sixty-eight knees, forty-four were rated excellent; fifteen, good; six, fair; and three, poor. Eighteen knees had symptoms related to the patellofemoral joint and sixty-three had a full range of motion; two knees had had manipulation for loss of flexion. At the follow-up evaluation, KT-1000 arthrometric measurements were obtained for both knees of fifty-six patients. Eighty-four per cent of the patients had an increase of three millimeters or less in anterior-posterior displacement of the tibia on the reconstructed side compared with the normal side, while 93 per cent had an increase of four millimeters or less. Postoperatively, there was no apparent association between changes in the Insall-Salvati patellar ligament-to-patella ratios and pain in the patellofemoral joint. The results of the arthroscopically assisted reconstructions combined with use of early range-of-motion exercises were comparable with those reported after open reconstruction and immobilization of the limb in a plaster cast. The frequency of pain in the patellofemoral joint and the need for manipulation because of loss of motion were decreased after the arthroscopically assisted procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8408155     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199309000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  28 in total

1.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: comparison of outside-in and all-inside techniques.

Authors:  S Brandsson; E Faxén; B I Eriksson; L Swärd; O Lundin; J Karlsson
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over the age of 50 years: 2- to 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mark J G Blyth; Harminder S Gosal; Wendy M Peake; R John Bartlett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Press-fit fixation in reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament, using bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Authors:  Moustafa Al-Husseiny; Khaled Batterjee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the two-incision technique.

Authors:  Raffaele Garofalo; Elyazid Mouhsine; Pierre Chambat; Olivier Siegrist
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Muscle performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  A Kobayashi; H Higuchi; M Terauchi; F Kobayashi; M Kimura; K Takagishi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  ACL reconstruction with "the original all-inside technique".

Authors:  Giuliano Cerulli; Giovanni Zamarra; Fabio Vercillo; Filippo Pelosi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft rotation on knee biomechanics.

Authors:  Levent Surer; Konstantinos Michail; Murat Koken; Can Yapici; Junjun Zhu; Brandon D Marshall; Monica A Linde; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Double-bundle ACL reconstruction demonstrated superior clinical stability to single-bundle ACL reconstruction: a matched-pairs analysis of instrumented tests of tibial anterior translation and internal rotation laxity.

Authors:  T P Branch; R Siebold; H I Freedberg; C A Jacobs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Differences in the rehabilitation period following two methods of anterior cruciate ligament replacement: semitendinosus/gracilis tendon vs. ligamentum patellae.

Authors:  Tim Rose; Thomas Engel; Joachim Bernhard; Pierre Hepp; Christoph Josten; Helmut Lill
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Post-operative problems following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  L C Almekinders; T Moore; D Freedman; T N Taft
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.