Literature DB >> 7553013

Post-operative problems following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

L C Almekinders1, T Moore, D Freedman, T N Taft.   

Abstract

Seventy adult patients were studied during the postoperative rehabilitation period following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in order to investigate the role of pre-, intra-, and postoperative factors in range of motion and graft problems. A standard bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft was used for the reconstruction. Pre- and intraoperative factors such as concomitant injuries, time from injury to surgery, age, sex, and tunnel placement were recorded. Tunnel placement was recorded on intraoperative radiographs of the final guide pin placement and compared to pin placement on cadaver knees. The results indicated a significant relation between early reconstruction (< 1 month) following the injury and range of motion problems during the early rehabilitation period (P < 0.001). This relation disappeared by the end of the first postoperative year. Prolonged surgery was also associated with early motion problems (P < 0.05). Graft laxity or failure was correlated with an earlier return of range of motion (P < 0.05). We hypothesized that graft failure can have a biologic cause rather than a mechanical one since intraoperative X-rays indicated a near-anatomic tunnel placement in this patient group when compared to ideal placement in the cadaver knees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7553013     DOI: 10.1007/bf01552379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  20 in total

1.  Tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions and graft impingement.

Authors:  S M Howell; J A Clark
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Loss of motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  C D Harner; J J Irrgang; J Paul; S Dearwater; F H Fu
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  The early treatment of motion complications after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  F R Noyes; R E Mangine; S D Barber
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A rationale for predicting anterior cruciate graft impingement by the intercondylar roof. A magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  S M Howell; J A Clark; T E Farley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Testing for isometry during reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Anatomical and biomechanical considerations.

Authors:  A A Sapega; R A Moyer; C Schneck; N Komalahiranya
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Complications of intra-articular anterior cruciate reconstruction.

Authors:  B Graf; F Uhr
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.182

7.  Anterior cruciate ligament replacements: a mechanical study of femoral attachment location, flexion angle at tensioning, and initial tension.

Authors:  D I Bylski-Austrow; E S Grood; M S Hefzy; J P Holden; D L Butler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Isometric versus tension measurements. A comparison for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  B Fleming; B D Beynnon; R J Johnson; W D McLeod; M H Pope
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  P Aglietti; R Buzzi; G Zaccherotti; P De Biase
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee.

Authors:  D M Daniel; L L Malcom; G Losse; M L Stone; R Sachs; R Burks
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  12 in total

1.  Effect of surgery to implant motion and force sensors on vertical ground reaction forces in the ovine model.

Authors:  Safa T Herfat; Jason T Shearn; Denis L Bailey; R Michael Greiwe; Marc T Galloway; Cindi Gooch; David L Butler
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  Arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction is best treated in a step-wise approach with early recognition and intervention: a systematic review.

Authors:  Seper Ekhtiari; Nolan S Horner; Darren de Sa; Nicole Simunovic; Michael T Hirschmann; Rick Ogilvie; Rebecca L Berardelli; Danny B Whelan; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Early versus delayed surgery for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Leigh Davies; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  ACL Reconstruction: Choosing the Graft.

Authors:  Giuliano Cerulli; Giacomo Placella; Enrico Sebastiani; Matteo Maria Tei; Andrea Speziali; Francesco Manfreda
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2013-06-12

Review 5.  [Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Diagnostics and therapy].

Authors:  W Teske; A Anastisiadis; T Lichtinger; C von Schulze Pellengahr; L V von Engelhardt; T Theodoridis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Acl reconstruction - it's all about timing.

Authors:  Stephanie Evans; Justin Shaginaw; Arthur Bartolozzi
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-04

7.  [Arthroscopic treatment of arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction. Local and generalized arthrofibrosis].

Authors:  H O Mayr; A Stöhr
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 1.154

8.  Functional outcome of an early anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in comparison to delayed: Are we waiting in vain?

Authors:  Rajeev Raj Manandhar; Karthik Chandrashekhar; Vinay Kumaraswamy; Santosh Sahanand; David Rajan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-03-18

Review 9.  Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Amit Kumar Agarwal; Sachin Ingole; Vipul Vijay
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-11-13

10.  Knee Extension Range of Motion at 4 Weeks Is Related to Knee Extension Loss at 12 Weeks After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Sarah Noll; J Craig Garrison; James Bothwell; John E Conway
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.