Literature DB >> 14513211

Differences in the rehabilitation period following two methods of anterior cruciate ligament replacement: semitendinosus/gracilis tendon vs. ligamentum patellae.

Tim Rose1, Thomas Engel, Joachim Bernhard, Pierre Hepp, Christoph Josten, Helmut Lill.   

Abstract

This study compared patient outcome during the early rehabilitation phase following two different methods of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: ligamentum patellae (LP) and semitendinosus/gracilis tendon (SG) based reconstruction. The study included 50 consecutive patients treated by each method, examined 6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Patients in the SG group showed significantly better Lysholm scores at 6 and 12 months, Tegner Activity Scale scores at 3 months, and pain profile assessments at 6 weeks and 3 months than those in the LP group. Significant advantages were observed in LP group in the Overall Knee Score at 6 weeks and in range-of-motion at 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months post-surgery. Stability tests revealed no significant differences between patients in the two groups. SG-based reconstruction of the ACL thus demonstrates advantages over LP-based reconstruction regarding pain and function, while LP-based reconstruction was associated with an earlier return of motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14513211     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-003-0438-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  38 in total

1.  Analysis of subjective, objective and functional examination tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A follow-up of 527 patients.

Authors:  N Sernert; J Kartus; K Köhler; S Stener; J Larsson; B I Eriksson; J Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The influence of functional knee bracing on the anterior cruciate ligament strain biomechanics in weightbearing and nonweightbearing knees.

Authors:  B C Fleming; P A Renstrom; B D Beynnon; B Engstrom; G Peura
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Leo A Pinczewski; David J Deehan; Lucy J Salmon; Vivianne J Russell; Amanda Clingeleffer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Early post-operative morbidity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus hamstring graft.

Authors:  J A Feller; K E Webster; B Gavin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Early versus late reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Results after five years of followup.

Authors:  M Marcacci; S Zaffagnini; F Iacono; M P Neri; A Petitto
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  There are differences in early morbidity after ACL reconstruction when comparing patellar tendon and semitendinosus tendon graft. A prospective randomized study of 107 patients.

Authors:  K Eriksson; P Anderberg; P Hamberg; P Olerud; T Wredmark
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.221

8.  Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft.

Authors:  I S Corry; J M Webb; A J Clingeleffer; L A Pinczewski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Robert J Johnson; Braden C Fleming; Pekka Kannus; Michael Kaplan; John Samani; Per Renström
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Retrospective direct comparison of three intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  P F Holmes; S L James; R L Larson; K M Singer; D C Jones
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  4 in total

1.  Impaction Of Rehabilitations And Strengthening Programs before And after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction In Return to the Fitness Level.

Authors:  Abdulwahab Ahmed Alzahrani
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2022-07-09

2.  Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life after robot-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon grafts.

Authors:  Dirk Stengel; Frank Klufmöller; Grit Rademacher; Sven Mutze; Kai Bauwens; Kay Butenschön; Julia Seifert; Michael Wich; Axel Ekkernkamp
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Prospective randomized clinical comparison of femoral transfixation versus bioscrew fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction--a preliminary report.

Authors:  Tim Rose; Pierre Hepp; Julia Venus; Christoph Stockmar; Christoph Josten; Helmut Lill
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The influence of electromyographic biofeedback therapy on knee extension following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Franz Christanell; Christian Hoser; Reinhard Huber; Christian Fink; Hannu Luomajoki
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2012-11-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.