Literature DB >> 8404913

Use of a DNA hybridization method to verify results of screening for methicillin resistance in staphylococci.

B Olsson-Liljequist1, P Larsson, S Ringertz, S Löfdahl.   

Abstract

Tests were performed by the disk diffusion method, agar dilution method and the E test to determine the susceptibility to methicillin and oxacillin of clinical isolates and control strains of Staphylococcus aureus (n = 106) and coagulase-negative species (n = 131). Results were compared with those of a dot blot DNA hybridization test, in which the mecA gene was detected using an oligonucleotide probe selected from the mecA gene. Among the Staphylococcus aureus strains the mecA gene was found in all but two strains inhibited by > or = 8 mg/l of methicillin and all but two strains inhibited by > or = 4 mg/l of oxacillin. A disk test using either 1 microgram oxacillin or 10 micrograms methicillin and a tentative resistance breakpoint of < or = 10 mm gave the best agreement with the hybridization test. For coagulase-negative staphylococci 34 of 35 strains inhibited by > or = 8 mg/l methicillin hybridized with the probe as well as 58 of 82 strains inhibited by 1-4 mg/l; 93 of 97 strains inhibited by > or = 0.5 mg/l oxacillin were also positive in the probe test. Using the 1 microgram oxacillin disk and a resistance breakpoint of < or = 10 mm good agreement was obtained between results of the disk diffusion and DNA hybridization tests. It is suggested that this genotypic method for detection of methicillin resistance is used as a reference method for routine methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8404913     DOI: 10.1007/bf01970958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  16 in total

1.  Correlation between regulation of mecA transcription and expression of methicillin resistance in staphylococci.

Authors:  C Ryffel; F H Kayser; B Berger-Bächi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Sequence comparison of mecA genes isolated from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  C Ryffel; W Tesch; I Birch-Machin; P E Reynolds; L Barberis-Maino; F H Kayser; B Berger-Bächi
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1990-09-28       Impact factor: 3.688

3.  A probe for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  A C Fluit; A T Box; J Verhoef
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Evaluation of the E test, a novel method of quantifying antimicrobial activity.

Authors:  D F Brown; L Brown
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 5.  Methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  B Cookson; I Phillips
Journal:  Soc Appl Bacteriol Symp Ser       Date:  1990

Review 6.  Genotypic approach to the study of bacterial resistance to antibiotics.

Authors:  P Courvalin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Screening tests for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  G Hedin; A Hambraeus
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Evaluation of laboratory tests for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  P E Coudron; D L Jones; H P Dalton; G L Archer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Extrachromosomal control of methicillin resistance and toxin production in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  K Dornbusch; H O Hallander; F Löfquist
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  The role of beta-lactamase in staphylococcal resistance to penicillinase-resistant penicillins and cephalosporins.

Authors:  L K McDougal; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of disk diffusion, the E test, and detection of mecA for determination of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  J G Mulder
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Species-specific identification of methicillin resistance in staphylococci.

Authors:  A C Petersson; H Miörner
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Comparison of PCR detection of mecA with standard susceptibility testing methods to determine methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  M K York; L Gibbs; F Chehab; G F Brooks
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Epidemiology of MRSA.

Authors:  W Hryniewicz
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  Revised interpretation of oxacillin MICs for Staphylococcus epidermidis based on mecA detection.

Authors:  C L McDonald; W E Maher; R J Fass
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Detection of methicillin-resistance gene in Staphylococcus epidermidis strains isolated from patients in Al-Zahra Hospital using polymerase chain reaction and minimum inhibitory concentration methods.

Authors:  Ebtehaj Pishva; Seyed Asghar Havaei; Firouz Arsalani; Tahmineh Narimani; Amir Azimian; Mojtaba Akbari
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2013-03-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.