Literature DB >> 8402425

Sex-related differences in coronary revascularization practices: the perspective from a Canadian queue management project.

C D Naylor1, C M Levinton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess sex-related differences in coronary revascularization practices in a Canadian setting.
DESIGN: Prospective analytic cohort study.
SETTING: Regional referral office in Toronto. PATIENTS: A selected but consecutive group of 131 women and 440 men referred by cardiologists for revascularization procedures between Jan. 3, 1989, and June 30, 1991.
INTERVENTIONS: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Nurse-coordinators placed the referral with a surgeon or interventional cardiologist at one of three hospitals, who then communicated directly with the referring cardiologist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptom status at referral, procedures requested and performed, and time from referral to procedure.
RESULTS: Although the women were more likely than the men to have unstable angina at the time of referral (odds ratio [OR] 2.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38 to 3.79, p = 0.0006), more women than men (16.8% v. 12.1%) were turned down for a procedure. Significant sex-related differences in practice patterns (p < 0.001) persisted after controlling for age or for the referring cardiologists' perception of expected procedural risk. A stepwise multivariate model showed that anatomy was the main determinant of case management; sex was the only other significant variable (p = 0.016). The referring physicians requested CABG more often for men than for women (p = 0.009), and the men accepted for a procedure were much more likely to undergo CABG than the women (OR 2.40, CI 1.47 to 3.93, p = 0.0002). Although the women undergoing CABG waited shorter periods than the men (p = 0.0035), this difference was attributable to their more severe symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: In this selected group women had more serious symptoms before referral but were turned down for revascularization more often than men. Reduced use of CABG rather than PTCA largely accounted for the sex-related differences in revascularization. Once accepted for a procedure women had shorter waiting times, which was appropriate given their more severe symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8402425      PMCID: PMC1485613     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  24 in total

1.  The Yentl syndrome.

Authors:  B Healy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Letter: Grading of angina pectoris.

Authors:  L Campeau
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Sex bias and coronary bypass surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators.

Authors:  R M Steingart; M Packer; P Hamm; M E Coglianese; B Gersh; E M Geltman; J Sollano; S Katz; L Moyé; L L Basta
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The appropriateness of performing coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  C M Winslow; J B Kosecoff; M Chassin; D E Kanouse; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Jul 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Empiric comparison of multivariate analytic techniques: advantages and disadvantages of recursive partitioning analysis.

Authors:  E F Cook; L Goldman
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1984

7.  Partitioning methods for classification and decision making in medicine.

Authors:  R J Marshall
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Sex differences in early and long-term results of coronary angioplasty in the NHLBI PTCA Registry.

Authors:  M J Cowley; S M Mullin; S F Kelsey; K M Kent; A R Gruentzig; K M Detre; E R Passamani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Sex bias in considering coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  J N Tobin; S Wassertheil-Smoller; J P Wexler; R M Steingart; N Budner; L Lense; J Wachspress
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Comparison of the long-term, postsurgical survival of women and men in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS).

Authors:  E D Eaker; R Kronmal; J W Kennedy; K Davis
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.749

View more
  3 in total

1.  Trends in the hospital management of unstable angina.

Authors:  R F Heller; H Powell; R L O'Connell; K D'Este; L L Lim
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Coronary artery bypass graft surgery and primary percutaneous coronary intervention choices in patients with similar coronary anatomy: A computer-based simulation examines the sex gap.

Authors:  B M Meyers; T Vira; Chi- Ming Chow; B L Abramson
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Gender influence in isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a propensity match score analysis of early outcomes.

Authors:  Bassel Suffian Al-Alao; Haralabos Parissis; Eilis McGovern; Michael Tolan; Vincent K Young
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-05-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.