Literature DB >> 8402127

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in The Netherlands.

P M Go1, F Schol, D J Gouma.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced into the Netherlands in the Spring of 1990. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of the procedure in Dutch hospitals over the first 2 years to obtain some insight into its safety and efficacy in general surgical practice. A written questionnaire was sent to all 138 Dutch surgical institutions enquiring about conversion rate, complications (with emphasis on mortality rate and common bile duct injuries), operating time and hospital stay. The surgeons' opinions were also sought on possible contraindications such as previous operation, bile duct stones and cholecystitis, as were their estimations of the percentage of patients in their practice eligible for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Data were obtained for 6076 laparoscopic cholecystectomies; the response rate was 100 per cent. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was necessary in 413 patients (6.8 per cent), mostly because of adhesions, cholecystitis, haemorrhage and unclear anatomy. Postoperative complications were reported in 260 patients (4.3 per cent). There were seven deaths (0.12 per cent) and 52 (0.86 per cent) bile duct injuries, of which 20 were recognized during laparoscopy. The mean operating time for the ten most recent patients in each institute was 70 (range 30-180) min and the mean hospital stay 4.5 (range 2-8) days. Previous lower abdominal operations were not considered to be a contraindication by 96 per cent of surgeons, whereas previous upper abdominal procedures were regarded as a contraindication by 66 per cent. After successful clearance of the bile duct at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, only 12 per cent would perform an open procedure. Moderate cholecystitis was not considered a contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy by 71 per cent of surgeons, but severe cholecystitis was a reason for open cholecystectomy for 83 per cent. In most surgical practices 70-80 per cent of patients were considered to be eligible for the laparoscopic procedure. In conclusion, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has gained rapid acceptance in the Netherlands. Although the number of bile duct injuries is high, the findings of this general survey are similar to those from highly specialized centres and match the overall results of conventional cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8402127     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800800938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  18 in total

1.  Stratification for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  W T van den Broek; A B Bijnen; P de Ruiter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: an 11-year experience in one institute.

Authors:  Theodoros Diamantis; Christos Tsigris; Andreas Kiriakopoulos; Efstathios Papalambros; John Bramis; Panagiotis Michail; Evangelos Felekouras; John Griniatsos; Theofilos Rosenberg; Nikolaos Kalahanis; Athanassios Giannopoulos; Christos Bakoyiannis; Elias Bastounis
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Referral pattern and timing of repair are risk factors for complications after reconstructive surgery for bile duct injury.

Authors:  Philip R de Reuver; Irene Grossmann; Olivier R Busch; Huug Obertop; Thomas M van Gulik; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: day-care versus clinical observation.

Authors:  Y Keulemans; J Eshuis; H de Haes; L T de Wit; D J Gouma
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; C K Kum; E Eypasch; M Miserez; A Paul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Persistent discharging wound sinus from retained gallstone fragments following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N Williams; J Hill; M Shafiq
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Litigious consequences of open and laparoscopic biliary surgical mishaps.

Authors:  J G Chandler; C R Voyles; T L Floore; L A Bartholomew
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Follow-up after combined surgical and radiologic management.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S A Martin; J L Cameron; C J Yeo; M A Talamini; S Kaushal; J Coleman; A C Venbrux; S J Savader; F A Osterman; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Bleeding complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Incidence, mechanisms, prevention and management.

Authors:  Robin Kaushik
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.407

10.  Iatrogenic bile duct injury--a cost analysis.

Authors:  Roland Andersson; Karin Eriksson; Per-Jonas Blind; Bobby Tingstedt
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.