Literature DB >> 8391549

Use of Probemix and OmniProbe biotinylated cDNA probes for detecting HPV infection in biopsy specimens from the genital tract.

I Zehbe1, E Rylander, A Strand, E Wilander.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare two commercially available pan probes for the identification of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA expression in histological sections and to type the HPV positive cases.
METHODS: 97 formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded biopsy specimens from the genital tract were tested for HPV positivity with in situ hybridisation using biotinylated cDNA pan probes--Probemix (Enzo) and OmniProbe (Digene). The HPV positive cases were further tested with HPV types 6/11, 16/18, and 31/33/35/51, and the HPV type was related to the histological diagnosis. Formalin fixed, HeLa cells (10-50 HPV 18 copies per cell) and SiHa cells (1-2 HPV 16 copies per cell) were used as reference cell lines.
RESULTS: 32% of the specimens gave positive nucleic signals with both Probemix and OmniProbe. Of these, 84% could be further characterised with regard to HPV types 6/11, 16/18, and 31/33/35/51; 4% of all cases were positive with either Probemix or OmniProbe. The concordance of these probes was high, 96% altogether. HeLa cells stained positive but SiHa cells did not.
CONCLUSION: There is no difference between Probemix and OmniProbe for the general detection of HPV. The mean detection limit of these probes is about 20 copies a cell.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8391549      PMCID: PMC501253          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.46.5.437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  7 in total

1.  An improved technique for the in situ detection of DNA after polymerase chain reaction amplification.

Authors:  G J Nuovo; F Gallery; P MacConnell; J Becker; W Bloch
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Comparison of 35S and biotin as labels for in situ hybridization: use of an HPV model system.

Authors:  E R Unger; M L Hammer; M L Chenggis
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 3.  In situ hybridisation: a new tool in pathology.

Authors:  A Warford
Journal:  Med Lab Sci       Date:  1988-10

4.  In situ hybridization analysis of human papillomavirus DNA segregation patterns in lesions of the female genital tract.

Authors:  G J Nuovo; D Friedman; R M Richart
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  In situ hybridization for the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) in gynaecological biopsies. A study of two commercial kits.

Authors:  I Zehbe; E Rylander; A Strand; E Wilander
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  The acetic acid test in evaluation of subclinical genital papillomavirus infection: a comparative study on penoscopy, histopathology, virology and scanning electron microscopy findings.

Authors:  A Wikström; M A Hedblad; B Johansson; M Kalantari; S Syrjänen; M Lindberg; G von Krogh
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1992-04

Review 7.  The biology and significance of human papillomavirus infections in the genital tract.

Authors:  R Reid; M J Campion
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Sensitive in situ hybridization with catalyzed reporter deposition, streptavidin-Nanogold, and silver acetate autometallography: detection of single-copy human papillomavirus.

Authors:  I Zehbe; G W Hacker; H Su; C Hauser-Kronberger; J F Hainfeld; R Tubbs
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Detection of human papillomavirus in cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia, using in situ hybridization and various polymerase chain reaction techniques.

Authors:  I Zehbe; E Rylander; K Edlund; G Wadell; E Wilander
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.064

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.