Literature DB >> 8383093

Detection of amplified DNA sequences by reverse chromosome painting using genomic tumor DNA as probe.

S Joos1, H Scherthan, M R Speicher, J Schlegel, T Cremer, P Lichter.   

Abstract

A modification of "reverse chromosome painting" was carried out using genomic DNA from tumor cells as a complex probe for chromosomal in situ suppression hybridization to normal metaphase chromosome spreads. Amplified DNA sequences contained in such probes showed specific signals, revealing the normal chromosome positions from which these sequences were derived. As a model system, genomic DNAs were analyzed from three tumor cell lines with amplification units including the proto-oncogene c-myc. The smallest amplification unit was about 90 kb and was present in 16-24 copies; the largest unit was bigger than 600 kb and was present in 16-32 copies. Specific signals that co-localized with a differently labeled c-myc probe on chromosome band 8q24 were obtained with genomic DNA from each cell line. In further experiments, genomic DNA derived from primary tumor material was used in the case of a male patient with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Southern blot analysis using an epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) probe that maps to 7p13 indicated the amplification of sequences from this gene. Using reverse chromosome painting, signals were found both on band 7p13 and bands 12q13-q15. Notably, the signal on 12q13-q15 was consistently stronger. The weaker 7p13 signal showed co-localization with the major signal of the differently labeled EGFR probe. A minor signal of this probe was seen on 12q13, suggesting cross-hybridization to ERB3 sequences homologous to EGFR. The results indicate co-amplification of sequences from bands 12q13-q15, in addition to sequences from band 7p13. Several oncogenes map to 12q13-q15 providing candidate genes for a tumor-associated proto-oncogene amplification. Although the nature of the amplified sequences needs to be clarified, this experiment demonstrates the potential of reverse chromosome painting with genomic tumor DNA for rapidly mapping the normal chromosomal localization of the DNA from which the amplified sequences were derived. In addition, a weaker staining of chromosomes 10 and X was consistently observed indicating that these chromosomes were present in only one copy in the GBM genome. This rapid approach can be used to analyze cases where no metaphase spreads from the tumor material are available. It does not require any preknowledge of amplified sequences and can be applied to screen large numbers of tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8383093     DOI: 10.1007/bf00202475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  22 in total

1.  Reverse chromosome painting: a method for the rapid analysis of aberrant chromosomes in clinical cytogenetics.

Authors:  N P Carter; M A Ferguson-Smith; M T Perryman; H Telenius; A H Pelmear; M A Leversha; M T Glancy; S L Wood; K Cook; H M Dyson
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Direct nonradioactive in situ hybridization of somatic cell hybrid DNA to human lymphocyte chromosomes.

Authors:  T Kievits; P Devilee; J Wiegant; M C Wapenaar; C J Cornelisse; G J van Ommen; P L Pearson
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1990

3.  Three breakpoints of variant t(2;8) translocations in Burkitt's lymphoma cells fall within a region 140 kilobases distal from c-myc.

Authors:  B Henglein; H Synovzik; P Groitl; G W Bornkamm; P Hartl; M Lipp
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Cytogenetic analysis by in situ hybridization with fluorescently labeled nucleic acid probes.

Authors:  D Pinkel; J W Gray; B Trask; G van den Engh; J Fuscoe; H van Dekken
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1986

5.  Homogeneously staining chromosomal regions contain amplified copies of an abundantly expressed cellular oncogene (c-myc) in malignant neuroendocrine cells from a human colon carcinoma.

Authors:  K Alitalo; M Schwab; C C Lin; H E Varmus; J M Bishop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Onc gene amplification in promyelocytic leukaemia cell line HL-60 and primary leukaemic cells of the same patient.

Authors:  R Dalla-Favera; F Wong-Staal; R C Gallo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-09-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Painting of human chromosomes with probes generated from hybrid cell lines by PCR with Alu and L1 primers.

Authors:  C Lengauer; H Riethman; T Cremer
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes.

Authors:  H Telenius; A H Pelmear; A Tunnacliffe; N P Carter; A Behmel; M A Ferguson-Smith; M Nordenskjöld; R Pfragner; B A Ponder
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 9.  Amplified cellular oncogenes in neoplasms of the human central nervous system.

Authors:  G N Fuller; S H Bigner
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization.

Authors:  S du Manoir; M R Speicher; S Joos; E Schröck; S Popp; H Döhner; G Kovacs; M Robert-Nicoud; P Lichter; T Cremer
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.132

View more
  22 in total

1.  Characterization of genomic alterations in hepatoblastomas. A role for gains on chromosomes 8q and 20 as predictors of poor outcome.

Authors:  R G Weber; T Pietsch; D von Schweinitz; P Lichter
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Reverse painting highlights the origin of chromosome aberrations.

Authors:  Elisabeth Blennow
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  High-level DNA amplifications are common genetic aberrations in B-cell neoplasms.

Authors:  C A Werner; H Döhner; S Joos; L H Trümper; M Baudis; T F Barth; G Ott; P Möller; P Lichter; M Bentz
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Chromosomal imbalances in primary lymphomas of the central nervous system.

Authors:  C H Rickert; B Dockhorn-Dworniczak; R Simon; W Paulus
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  Demystified ... FISH.

Authors:  J J Waters; A L Barlow; C P Gould
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  1998-04

6.  Specific chromosomal imbalances in human papillomavirus-transfected cells during progression toward immortality.

Authors:  S Solinas-Toldo; M Dürst; P Lichter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Comparative genomic hybridization of human malignant gliomas reveals multiple amplification sites and nonrandom chromosomal gains and losses.

Authors:  E Schröck; G Thiel; T Lozanova; S du Manoir; M C Meffert; A Jauch; M R Speicher; P Nürnberg; S Vogel; W Jänisch
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 8.  Detection of genomic changes in cancer by in situ hybridization.

Authors:  A H Hopman; C E Voorter; F C Ramaekers
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.316

9.  Genes proximal and distal to MYCN are highly expressed in human neuroblastoma as visualized by comparative expressed sequence hybridization.

Authors:  Cornelia Stock; Eva Bozsaky; Franz Watzinger; Ulrike Poetschger; Lukas Orel; Thomas Lion; Agata Kowalska; Peter F Ambros
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Analysis of changes in DNA sequence copy number by comparative genomic hybridization in archival paraffin-embedded tumor samples.

Authors:  J Isola; S DeVries; L Chu; S Ghazvini; F Waldman
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.