Literature DB >> 8444465

Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization.

S du Manoir1, M R Speicher, S Joos, E Schröck, S Popp, H Döhner, G Kovacs, M Robert-Nicoud, P Lichter, T Cremer.   

Abstract

Comparative genomic in situ hybridization (CGH) provides a new possibility for searching genomes for imbalanced genetic material. Labeled genomic test DNA, prepared from clinical or tumor specimens, is mixed with differently labeled control DNA prepared from cells with normal chromosome complements. The mixed probe is used for chromosomal in situ suppression (CISS) hybridization to normal metaphase spreads (CGH-metaphase spreads). Hybridized test and control DNA sequences are detected via different fluorochromes, e.g., fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and tetraethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC). The ratios of FITC/TRITC fluorescence intensities for each chromosome or chromosome segment should then reflect its relative copy number in the test genome compared with the control genome, e.g., 0.5 for monosomies, 1 for disomies, 1.5 for trisomies, etc. Initially, model experiments were designed to test the accuracy of fluorescence ratio measurements on single chromosomes. DNAs from up to five human chromosome-specific plasmid libraries were labeled with biotin and digoxigenin in different hapten proportions. Probe mixtures were used for CISS hybridization to normal human metaphase spreads and detected with FITC and TRITC. An epifluorescence microscope equipped with a cooled charge coupled device (CCD) camera was used for image acquisition. Procedures for fluorescence ratio measurements were developed on the basis of commercial image analysis software. For hapten ratios 4/1, 1/1 and 1/4, fluorescence ratio values measured for individual chromosomes could be used as a single reliable parameter for chromosome identification. Our findings indicate (1) a tight correlation of fluorescence ratio values with hapten ratios, and (2) the potential of fluorescence ratio measurements for multiple color chromosome painting. Subsequently, genomic test DNAs, prepared from a patient with Down syndrome, from blood of a patient with T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia, and from cultured cells of a renal papillary carcinoma cell line, were applied in CGH experiments. As expected, significant differences in the fluorescence ratios could be measured for chromosome types present in different copy numbers in these test genomes, including a trisomy of chromosome 21, the smallest autosome of the human complement. In addition, chromosome material involved in partial gains and losses of the different tumors could be mapped to their normal chromosome counterparts in CGH-metaphase spreads. An alternative and simpler evaluation procedure based on visual inspection of CCD images of CGH-metaphase spreads also yielded consistent results from several independent observers. Pitfalls, methodological improvements, and potential applications of CGH analyses are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8444465     DOI: 10.1007/bf00202476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  32 in total

1.  Chromosome 16-specific repetitive DNA sequences that map to chromosomal regions known to undergo breakage/rearrangement in leukemia cells.

Authors:  R L Stallings; N A Doggett; K Okumura; D C Ward
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 2.  Three-dimensional multiple-wavelength fluorescence microscopy for the structural analysis of biological phenomena.

Authors:  Y Hiraoka; J R Swedlow; M R Paddy; D A Agard; J W Sedat
Journal:  Semin Cell Biol       Date:  1991-06

3.  Construction and characterization of plasmid libraries enriched in sequences from single human chromosomes.

Authors:  C Collins; W L Kuo; R Segraves; J Fuscoe; D Pinkel; J W Gray
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.736

4.  Chemical differentiation along metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  T Caspersson; S Farber; G E Foley; J Kudynowski; E J Modest; E Simonsson; U Wagh; L Zech
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 5.  The molecular genetics of cancer.

Authors:  J M Bishop
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-01-16       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries.

Authors:  P Lichter; T Cremer; J Borden; L Manuelidis; D C Ward
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  A method for automatic classification of large and small myelinated fibre populations in peripheral nerves.

Authors:  Y Usson; S Torch; G Drouet d'Aubigny
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes.

Authors:  H Telenius; A H Pelmear; A Tunnacliffe; N P Carter; A Behmel; M A Ferguson-Smith; M Nordenskjöld; R Pfragner; B A Ponder
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 9.  Tumor suppressor genes.

Authors:  R A Weinberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Detection of amplified DNA sequences by reverse chromosome painting using genomic tumor DNA as probe.

Authors:  S Joos; H Scherthan; M R Speicher; J Schlegel; T Cremer; P Lichter
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.132

View more
  87 in total

Review 1.  Comparative genomic hybridisation.

Authors:  M M Weiss; M A Hermsen; G A Meijer; N C van Grieken; J P Baak; E J Kuipers; P J van Diest
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  1999-10

Review 2.  New tools in molecular pathology.

Authors:  P Lichter
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Genomic imbalances in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma identified by molecular cytogenetic techniques.

Authors:  Marilanda Ferreira Bellini; Ana Elizabete Silva; Marileila Varella-Garcia
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.771

4.  Characterization of genomic alterations in hepatoblastomas. A role for gains on chromosomes 8q and 20 as predictors of poor outcome.

Authors:  R G Weber; T Pietsch; D von Schweinitz; P Lichter
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Inherited DNA amplification of the proximal 15q region: cytogenetic and molecular studies.

Authors:  C Mignon; F Parente; C Stavropoulou; P Collignon; A Moncla; C Turc-Carel; M G Mattei
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  High-level DNA amplifications are common genetic aberrations in B-cell neoplasms.

Authors:  C A Werner; H Döhner; S Joos; L H Trümper; M Baudis; T F Barth; G Ott; P Möller; P Lichter; M Bentz
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Chromosomal imbalances in primary lymphomas of the central nervous system.

Authors:  C H Rickert; B Dockhorn-Dworniczak; R Simon; W Paulus
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  A new case of an interstitial deletion (4)(q25q27) characterised by molecular cytogenetic techniques and review of the literature.

Authors:  Sandra Anna Becker; Susanne Popp; Klaus Rager; Anna Jauch
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 9.  Genomic stability and instability in different neuroepithelial tumors. A role for chromosome structure?

Authors:  L Manuelidis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Comparative genomic hybridisation as a supportive tool in diagnostic pathology.

Authors:  M M Weiss; E J Kuipers; S G M Meuwissen; P J van Diest; G A Meijer
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.