Literature DB >> 8372224

Silicone breast implants: US evaluation.

N D DeBruhl1, D P Gorczyca, C Y Ahn, W W Shaw, L W Bassett.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the value of breast ultrasonography (US) in the assessment of silicone breast implants for rupture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-four women with local or systemic symptoms related to silicone implants underwent breast US. Of these, 28 underwent surgical removal of the implants.
RESULTS: Of 57 implants removed, 37 were intact. The most reliable sign of an intact implant was an anechoic interior, although reverberation artifact and radical folds could be seen. Of 20 ruptured implants, 16 were intracapsular and four were extracapsular ruptures. The most reliable US sign of rupture was echogenic, horizontal ("stepladder") lines (14 of 20 ruptures). Two of the four extracapsular ruptures were accurately identified as echogenic nodules outside the implant; two were false-negative findings. Three intracapsular ruptures identified at US were false-positive; six were false-negative. Overall sensitivity for rupture was 70%, specificity was 92%, positive predictive value was 82%, and negative predictive value was 85%.
CONCLUSION: Breast US is capable of depicting intracapsular and extracapsular rupture of breast implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8372224     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.189.1.8372224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

1.  PIP breast implants: rupture rate and correlation with breast cancer.

Authors:  M Moschetta; M Telegrafo; I Cornacchia; L Vincenti; V Ranieri; A Cirili; L Rella; A A Stabile Ianora; G Angelelli
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

2. 

Authors:  H Tristant
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 3.  Silicone breast implant rupture: a review.

Authors:  Christopher Hillard; Jason D Fowler; Ruth Barta; Bruce Cunningham
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-04

Review 4.  The effect of study design biases on the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting silicone breast implant ruptures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jae W Song; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Lillian T Bellfi; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  A Surgeon's Empirical Perspectives on Use of High-resolution Ultrasound in Preoperatively Detecting a Rupture in the Context of Breast Implant Crisis in Korea.

Authors:  Bum Sik Bang; Seong Hoon Jung; Eun Kyoung Lee; Jung Youp Sung; Keun Yeong Song; Young Bum Yoo; Dong Wook Park; Jeong Eun Sohn; Jae Hong Kim
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Unilateral spontaneous rupture of a testicular implant thirteen years after bilateral insertion: a case report.

Authors:  Michael St J Floyd; Helen Williams; Sanjay K Agarwal; Alan R De Bolla
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2010-10-26

Review 7.  Hepatobiliary complications from ruptured silicone breast implants - a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Joshua Agilinko; Dharshanan Raj; Ken Vin Wong; Daniele Fanelli; Nicklaus Ng; Bertrand Agilinko; Mohammad Hasan
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-25

8.  Management of Testicular Silicone Gel-Filled Prosthesis Rupture: Case Report of a Rare Event and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Quang-Bao Phan; Nicolas Koutlidis; Céline Duperron; Eric Mourey; Frédéric Michel; Luc Cormier
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2016-03-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.