Literature DB >> 28497020

Silicone breast implant rupture: a review.

Christopher Hillard1, Jason D Fowler1, Ruth Barta1, Bruce Cunningham1.   

Abstract

Silicone breast implants have been in use for nearly 6 decades. In this time they have undergone significant changes in design and use. They have been subject to intense scrutiny with regard to safety and efficacy, including an almost 10 years moratorium on their use. The current generations of implants have been followed via the manufacturer's Core studies in order to obtain long term data regarding safety and complications. The results of the more recent studies are compiled in this review. Rupture rates are initially very low and begin to increase after 6-8 years of implantation. Implant rupture may be detected by physical exam, ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The majority of silicone implant ruptures are clinically undetectable. Symptomatic patients may present with capsular contracture, breast lumps or changes in breast shape. The most common cause of implant rupture is instrument damage during placement. Implant rupture may be confined to the peri-prosthetic capsule or may extravasate into the breast tissue. Patients with ruptured implants have been studied closely and the consensus of the literature states there are no health risks associated with implant rupture. Symptomatic patients with ruptured implants should be offered the choice of observation, or explantation and capsulectomy with or without replacement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implant; rupture; silicone

Year:  2017        PMID: 28497020      PMCID: PMC5409893          DOI: 10.21037/gs.2016.09.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  29 in total

1.  Silicone gel-filled breast implant integrity: a retrospective review of 478 consecutively explanted implants.

Authors:  N Collis; D T Sharpe
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  The diagnosis of silicone breast implant rupture.

Authors:  David P Gorczyca; Stephanie M Gorczyca; Kathryn L Gorczyca
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Breast implant rupture and connective tissue disease: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Lisbet Rosenkrantz Hölmich; Loren Lipworth; Joseph K McLaughlin; Søren Friis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Imaging signs and radiologists' jargon of ruptured breast implants.

Authors:  W H Beekman; W R van Straalen; J J Hage; A H Taets van Amerongen; J W Mulder
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Economic analysis of screening strategies for rupture of silicone gel breast implants.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung; Sunitha Malay; Melissa J Shauver; H Myra Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture: clinical findings compared with findings at magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Lisbet Rosenkrantz Hölmich; Jon P Fryzek; Kim Kjøller; Vibeke Bro Breiting; Anna Jørgensen; Christen Krag; Joseph K McLaughlin
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Prevalence of rupture of silicone gel breast implants revealed on MR imaging in a population of women in Birmingham, Alabama.

Authors:  S L Brown; M S Middleton; W A Berg; M S Soo; G Pennello
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Effects of capsular contracture on ultrasonic screening for silicone gel breast implant rupture.

Authors:  M Medot; G H Landis; C E McGregor; K A Gutowski; M C Foshager; H J Griffiths; B L Cunningham
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Incidence of silicone breast implant rupture.

Authors:  Lisbet R Hölmich; Søren Friis; Jon P Fryzek; Ilse M Vejborg; Carsten Conrad; Susanne Sletting; Kim Kjøller; Joseph K McLaughlin; Jørgen H Olsen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-07

Review 10.  MR imaging of breast implants.

Authors:  D P Gorczyca
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.266

View more
  26 in total

1.  Inflammatory response to the anti PD-L1 drug, atezolizumab, masquerades as breast implant rupture.

Authors:  Marie-Eve Marcotte; François Panet; Etienne Croteau; Marie-Anne Richard; Michel Pavic; Marc-André Levasseur
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Breast reconstruction of an unusual configuration using two paranemic implants.

Authors:  Naohiro Ishii; Jiro Ando; Michiko Harao; Masaru Takemae
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12

3.  Assessment of Risk Factors for Rupture in Breast Reconstruction Patients with Macrotextured Breast Implants.

Authors:  Guido Paolini; Guido Firmani; Francesca Briganti; Mattia Macino; Simone Nigrelli; Michail Sorotos; Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  A Surgeon's Empirical Perspectives on Use of High-resolution Ultrasound in Preoperatively Detecting a Rupture in the Context of Breast Implant Crisis in Korea.

Authors:  Bum Sik Bang; Seong Hoon Jung; Eun Kyoung Lee; Jung Youp Sung; Keun Yeong Song; Young Bum Yoo; Dong Wook Park; Jeong Eun Sohn; Jae Hong Kim
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Silicone breast implants and depression, fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome in a rheumatology clinic population.

Authors:  Thomas Khoo; Susanna Proudman; Vidya Limaye
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Long-term results measured by BREAST-Q reveal higher patient satisfaction after "autoimplant-mastopexy" than augmentation-mastopexy.

Authors:  Lisanne Grünherz; Anna Burger; Pietro Giovanoli; Nicole Lindenblatt
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-10

7.  Suppression of the fibrotic encapsulation of silicone implants by inhibiting the mechanical activation of pro-fibrotic TGF-β.

Authors:  Ronen Schuster; Sander van Putten; Nina Noskovicova; Maya Ezzo; Anne Koehler; Stellar Boo; Nuno M Coelho; David Griggs; Peter Ruminski; Christopher A McCulloch; Boris Hinz
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 25.671

8.  Safety and Effectiveness of Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants in Primary Augmentation Patients.

Authors:  Daniel Maxwell; Megan Estes; Jennifer McMillen Walcott; John W Canady; Tina D Hunter; Larry Gache; Bernadette Wang-Ashraf; Diane Alexander
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.283

9.  Influence of Breast Implant Surface Finishing on Physicochemical and Mechanical Properties before and after Extreme Degradation Studies.

Authors:  Izabelle de Mello Gindri; Lucas Kuth de Azambuja; Michele da Silva Barreto; Dionatha José do Prado; Gean Vitor Salmoria; Carlos Rodrigo de Mello Roesler
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2021-06-29

10.  Injectable non-leaching tissue-mimetic bottlebrush elastomers as an advanced platform for reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Erfan Dashtimoghadam; Farahnaz Fahimipour; Andrew N Keith; Foad Vashahi; Pavel Popryadukhin; Mohammad Vatankhah-Varnosfaderani; Sergei S Sheiko
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.