Literature DB >> 16804920

Partial field-of-view spiral phase-contrast imaging using complex difference processing.

Reza Nezafat1, Richard B Thompson, J Andrew Derbyshire, Elliot R McVeigh.   

Abstract

Rapid flow imaging was achieved with a partial field of view (pFOV) spiral motion-encoded technique. The FOV and the acquisition time were reduced by a factor of 2 by undersampling k-space. The pFOV spiral k-space trajectory aliased signals from outside a circular ring whose radius was inversely proportional to the distance between adjacent spirals in k-space. In this study the FOV was adjusted so that all of the moving spins were located inside the inner half circle of the full FOV. Complex subtraction of two differentially flow-encoded images was used to remove the spurious phase sources and provide an accurate measurement of flow. The complex subtraction process also serves to eliminate aliasing artifacts that are generated by static tissue from outside the reduced FOV. Experiments in a flow phantom and volunteers showed that the flow estimates obtained by pFOV spiral motion encoding are in good agreement with the estimates reconstructed using complex difference processing. Copyright (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16804920      PMCID: PMC2041904          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  18 in total

1.  Fast spiral coronary artery imaging.

Authors:  C H Meyer; B S Hu; D G Nishimura; A Macovski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  D C Noll; D G Nishimura; A Macovski
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Comparison of phase-difference and complex-difference processing in phase-contrast MR angiography.

Authors:  M A Bernstein; Y Ikezaki
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  N J Pelc; R J Herfkens; A Shimakawa; D R Enzmann
Journal:  Magn Reson Q       Date:  1991-10

5.  Quantitative flow measurement in phase contrast MR angiography.

Authors:  M F Walker; S P Souza; C L Dumoulin
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Constrained reconstruction: a superresolution, optimal signal-to-noise alternative to the Fourier transform in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  E M Haacke; Z P Liang; S H Izen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  C L Dumoulin; H R Hart
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Verification and evaluation of internal flow and motion. True magnetic resonance imaging by the phase gradient modulation method.

Authors:  P R Moran; R A Moran; N Karstaedt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  A velocity k-space analysis of flow effects in echo-planar and spiral imaging.

Authors:  D G Nishimura; P Irarrazabal; C H Meyer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  A flow velocity zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans.

Authors:  P R Moran
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.