Literature DB >> 8370884

Demonstration of the precedence effect in an insect.

R A Wyttenbach1, R R Hoy.   

Abstract

Field crickets are interesting models for study of auditory phenomena because they solve many of the same acoustic problems as humans, but with simpler nervous systems. Previous work in this lab and others has investigated sound localization, frequency and temporal pattern discrimination, habituation and dishabituation, and categorical perception. This paper demonstrates the precedence effect in crickets, using a standard two-pulse paradigm with a directional escape response to ultrasound. When two pulses of ultrasound are presented form opposite sides with a delay between, crickets respond only to the first pulse for delays of approximately 4 to 75 ms. For delays of 0 to 2 ms, the direction of response is variable (the first wave front does not have precedence); for delays over approximately 75 ms, crickets respond directionally to each of the two pulses. Some neural correlates of the precedence effect were studied by using this paradigm during recordings from a bilateral pair of ascending second-order auditory interneurons known to initiate ultrasound avoidance. There are no ipsilateral-contralateral differences in their responses that could account for the precedence effect; such interactions in the brain must be involved instead. This seems to be the first test of precedence effect in a nonmammal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8370884     DOI: 10.1121/1.408207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Reversible inactivation of the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus reveals its role in the processing of multiple sound sources in the inferior colliculus of bats.

Authors:  R M Burger; G D Pollak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A precedence effect resolves phantom sound source illusions in the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea.

Authors:  Norman Lee; Damian O Elias; Andrew C Mason
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Short-latency, goal-directed movements of the pinnae to sounds that produce auditory spatial illusions.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Elizabeth M McClaine; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Binaural cross-correlation predicts the responses of neurons in the owl's auditory space map under conditions simulating summing localization.

Authors:  C H Keller; T T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Physiological and psychophysical modeling of the precedence effect.

Authors:  Jing Xia; Andrew Brughera; H Steven Colburn; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-04-01

6.  A precedence effect underlies preferences for calls with leading pulses in the grey treefrog, Hyla versicolor.

Authors:  Vincent T Marshall; H Carl Gerhardt
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 7.  Signal interactions and interference in insect choruses: singing and listening in the social environment.

Authors:  Michael D Greenfield
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  How females of chirping and trilling field crickets integrate the 'what' and 'where' of male acoustic signals during decision making.

Authors:  Eileen Gabel; David A Gray; R Matthias Hennig
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Intracellular recordings reveal novel features of neurons that code interaural intensity disparities in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Na Li; Joshua X Gittelman; George D Pollak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Responses to simulated echoes by neurons in the barn owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  C H Keller; T T Takahashi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.