Literature DB >> 8370583

Down syndrome: effects of demographic factors and prenatal diagnosis on the future livebirth prevalence.

M C Cornel1, A S Breed, J R Beekhuis, G J te Meerman, L P ten Kate.   

Abstract

In northwest European countries maternal age is increasing. This will lead to an increase of the prevalence of Down syndrome conceptuses. Meanwhile, the increased use of prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis (PCD) will lead to a decrease in the prevalence of Down syndrome among livebirths. We were interested to know what the result of these two opposite developments would be in the near future, and we describe here a model to quantify these processes and the resulting livebirth prevalence of Down syndrome. The model is demonstrated for The Netherlands from 1992 to 2001. The predicted livebirth prevalence for The Netherlands in 1992 is 1.36 per 1000. Demographic factors will cause an increase to 1.76 per 1000 in 2001 with present indications for PCD and a utilization ratio of 50%. An increase of the utilization ratio to 90% in 2001 will lead to a prevalence of 1.22 per 1000, a little less than the present prevalence. Alternative screening programs, including maternal serum screening, could lead to a further decrease of the livebirth prevalence. The model described here can be used for evaluation of the consequences of alternative forms of Down syndrome screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Factors; Behavior; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Estimation Technics; Europe; Examinations And Diagnoses; Intelligence; Laboratory Examinations And Diagnoses; Maternal Age; Measurement; Mental Retardation; Models, Theoretical; Netherlands; Parental Age; Personality; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Projection; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcomes; Prevalence; Psychological Factors; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Screening; Western Europe

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8370583     DOI: 10.1007/bf00219685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  18 in total

1.  Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome with use of maternal serum markers.

Authors:  J E Haddow; G E Palomaki; G J Knight; J Williams; A Pulkkinen; J A Canick; D N Saller; G B Bowers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome in early pregnancy.

Authors:  N J Wald; H S Cuckle; J W Densem; K Nanchahal; P Royston; T Chard; J E Haddow; G J Knight; G E Palomaki; J A Canick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-08

3.  Maternal age-specific rates of chromosome abnormalities at chorionic villus study: a revision.

Authors:  E B Hook; P K Cross
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The natural history of cytogenetically abnormal fetuses detected at midtrimester amniocentesis which are not terminated electively: new data and estimates of the excess and relative risk of late fetal death associated with 47,+21 and some other abnormal karyotypes.

Authors:  E B Hook; B B Topol; P K Cross
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Women's choices for fetal chromosome analysis.

Authors:  L Abramsky; C H Rodeck
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  [Serum screening of pregnant women for fetal neural tube defects and Down syndrome; initial experiences in The Netherlands].

Authors:  J R Beekhuis; A Mantingh; B T de Wolf; J M van Lith; A S Breed
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  1993-06-26

7.  [How women cope with the results of maternal serum screening for fetal neural tube defects and Down syndrome].

Authors:  L I Kamerbeek; E E Roelofsen; J R Beekhuis; T Tijmstra; A Mantingh
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  1993-06-26

Review 8.  Impact of public health on human genetics.

Authors:  B Modell; A M Kuliev
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.438

9.  Estimating a woman's risk of having a pregnancy associated with Down's syndrome using her age and serum alpha-fetoprotein level.

Authors:  H S Cuckle; N J Wald; S G Thompson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1987-05

10.  Prenatal diagnosis and genetic screening. Community and service implications. Summary and recommendations of a report of the Royal College of Physicians.

Authors: 
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1989-10
View more
  7 in total

1.  Down's syndrome: the effects of prenatal diagnosis and demographic factors in a region of the eastern part of Germany.

Authors:  C Rösch; V Steinbicker; S Kropf
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Strategies for antenatal detection of Down's syndrome.

Authors:  J P Wyllie; R J Madar; M Wright; J Burn; C Wren
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Attitudes towards Down's syndrome: follow up of a cohort of 280 cases.

Authors:  C Julian-Reynier; Y Aurran; A Dumaret; A Maron; F Chabal; F Giraud; S Aymé
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 4.  Down syndrome and coeliac disease: five new cases with a review of the literature.

Authors:  M I Hilhorst; M Brink; E A Wauters; R H Houwen
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Selected birth defects data from population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States, 2006 to 2010: featuring trisomy conditions.

Authors:  Cara T Mai; James E Kucik; Jennifer Isenburg; Marcia L Feldkamp; Lisa K Marengo; Erin M Bugenske; Phoebe G Thorpe; Jodi M Jackson; Adolfo Correa; Russel Rickard; C J Alverson; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2013-11

6.  Frequency of prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis and pregnancy outcomes by maternal race-ethnicity, and the effect on the prevalence of trisomy 21, Metropolitan Atlanta, 1996-2005.

Authors:  Jodi M Jackson; Krista S Crider; Janet D Cragan; Sonja A Rasmussen; Richard S Olney
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Older mothers and increased impact of prenatal screening: stable livebirth prevalence of trisomy 21 in the Netherlands for the period 2000-2013.

Authors:  Maurike D de Groot-van der Mooren; Saskia Tamminga; Dick Oepkes; Michel E Weijerman; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.246

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.