Literature DB >> 11078119

Down's syndrome: the effects of prenatal diagnosis and demographic factors in a region of the eastern part of Germany.

C Rösch1, V Steinbicker, S Kropf.   

Abstract

The epidemiological analysis of trisomy 21 presented for the new federal German state of Saxony-Anhalt describes trends and changes in the frequency of Down's syndrome and prevalences of the pregnancy outcomes including acceptance of prenatal diagnostic measures in the period from 1980 and with separate analysis for the period since reunification in 1990. The average prevalence in the entire period is 1.0 per 1000 births. In 1997, a prevalence of 1.7 per 1000 births was already observed. After 1990, there is an increase in the prevalence of conceptions with trisomy 21 whereas the prevalence of live births with Down's syndrome remained the same. The reasons for this are an increase in the age of the mothers and a broad acceptance of prenatal diagnostics. Ethical questions, that might for example reveal societal changes in the attitude to children with Down's syndrome have not been considered in the analysis, since this would require sociological investigations which cannot be carried out by the malformations register.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11078119     DOI: 10.1023/a:1007693025935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  18 in total

1.  The triple-marker test in predicting fetal aneuploidy: a compromise between sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  K Huderer-Duric; S Skrablin; I Kuvacic; Z Sonicki; D Rubala; E Suchanek
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  Prediction of the number of Down's syndrome infants to be born in England and Wales up to the year 2000 and their likely survival rates.

Authors:  A Nicholson; E Alberman
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  1992-12

3.  Birth prevalence of Down's syndrome in England and Wales.

Authors:  H Cuckle; K Nanchahal; N Wald
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Trends in prenatal screening for and diagnosis of Down's syndrome: England and Wales, 1989-97.

Authors:  D Mutton; R G Ide; E Alberman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-03

5.  Birth prevalence of Down's syndrome in England and Wales 1990 to 1997.

Authors:  T Huang; H Watt; N Wald; J Morris; D Mutton; E Alberman; C Kelekun
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  The effects of prenatal diagnosis, population ageing, and changing fertility rates on the live birth prevalence of Down syndrome in New York State, 1983-1992.

Authors:  C L Olsen; P K Cross; L J Gensburg; J P Hughes
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Attitudes towards Down's syndrome: follow up of a cohort of 280 cases.

Authors:  C Julian-Reynier; Y Aurran; A Dumaret; A Maron; F Chabal; F Giraud; S Aymé
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Projection of Down's syndrome births in the United States 1979-2000, and the potential effects of prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  C A Huether
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Rates of chromosome abnormalities at different maternal ages.

Authors:  E B Hook
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Recent trends in the prevalence of Down syndrome in Japan, 1980-1997.

Authors:  N Hoshi; R Hattori; K Hanatani; K Okuyama; H Yamada; T Kishida; T Yamada; T Sagawa; Y Sumiyoshi; S Fujimoto
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1999-06-04
View more
  5 in total

1.  Treatment and prognostic impact of transient leukemia in neonates with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Jan-Henning Klusmann; Ursula Creutzig; Martin Zimmermann; Michael Dworzak; Norbert Jorch; Claudia Langebrake; Arnulf Pekrun; Katarina Macakova-Reinhardt; Dirk Reinhardt
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Influence of advanced age of maternal grandmothers on Down syndrome.

Authors:  Suttur S Malini; Nallur B Ramachandra
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 2.103

3.  Health behaviour modelling for prenatal diagnosis in Australia: a geodemographic framework for health service utilisation and policy development.

Authors:  Evelyne E Muggli; David McCloskey; Jane L Halliday
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Down syndrome, paternal age and education: comparison of California and the Czech Republic.

Authors:  Dagmara Dzurova; Hynek Pikhart
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Analysis of the Global Disease Burden of Down Syndrome Using YLDs, YLLs, and DALYs Based on the Global Burden of Disease 2019 Data.

Authors:  Qingting Bu; Rong Qiang; Hua Cheng; Anmin Wang; Huangtao Chen; Zhenyu Pan
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.418

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.