Literature DB >> 8366477

The processing of homophonic homographs during reading: evidence from eye movement studies.

J M Pacht1, K Rayner.   

Abstract

Research on the processing of homophonic homographs during reading is reviewed. The primary dependent variable considered was fixation time on target homographs. Both the characteristics of the homograph (whether there are two equally likely meanings or one dominant meaning) and the characteristics of the preceding context (whether it is neutral or contains disambiguating information) were varied. When the preceding context was neutral, readers fixated longer on balanced homographs (homographs having two equally likely meanings) than on control words matched on frequency and length, but didn't look any longer at biased homographs (homographs having a highly dominant meaning) than matched control words. However, when the preceding context disambiguated toward the subordinate meaning, readers fixated longer on a biased homograph than a matched control word (the subordinate bias effect). Attempts to eliminate the subordinate bias effect are described and the implications of our research for models of lexical ambiguity resolution are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8366477     DOI: 10.1007/bf01067833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  8 in total

1.  Influence of contextual features on the activation of ambiguous word meanings.

Authors:  S T Paul; G Kellas; M Martin; M B Clark
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Fast priming during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  S C Sereno; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words.

Authors:  K Rayner; L Frazier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; K Rayner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-12

5.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

6.  The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading.

Authors:  D A Balota; A Pollatsek; K Rayner
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Saccade size in reading depends upon character spaces and not visual angle.

Authors:  R E Morrison; K Rayner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-10

8.  Semantic facilitation across sensory modalities in the processing of individual words and sentences.

Authors:  D A Swinney; W Onifer; P Prather; M Hirshkowitz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1979-05
  8 in total
  17 in total

1.  The influence of global discourse on lexical ambiguity resolution.

Authors:  H Vu; G Kellas; K Metcalf; R Herman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  Global context effects on processing lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye fixations.

Authors:  G Kambe; K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

3.  Morphemic ambiguity resolution in Chinese: activation of the subordinate meaning with a prior dominant-biased context.

Authors:  Yiu-Kei Tsang; Hsuan-Chih Chen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

4.  To mind the mind: an event-related potential study of word class and semantic ambiguity.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Lee; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

6.  Revisiting effects of contextual strength on the subordinate bias effect: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Jorie Colbert-Getz; Anne E Cook
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-11

7.  Morphological Decomposition in Reading Hebrew Homographs.

Authors:  Paul Miller; Batel Liran-Hazan; Vered Vaknin
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-06

8.  Do resource constraints affect lexical processing? Evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Mallorie Leinenger; Mark Myslín; Keith Rayner; Roger Levy
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Does contextual strength modulate the subordinate bias effect? A reply to Kellas and Vu.

Authors:  K S Binder; K Rayner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

10.  Tracking competition and cognitive control during language comprehension with multi-voxel pattern analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Musz; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.