Literature DB >> 8366461

Flexural strength of provisional restorative materials.

Y I Osman1, C P Owen.   

Abstract

A provisional restorative material must be strong enough to resist fracture during function. This study tested five autopolymerizing provisional resin materials under conditions that related the stresses acting on them to those acting on a fixed partial denture. The highest values for fracture resistance were displayed by Snap poly(ethyl methacrylate) material. However, two of the 11 samples of this material displayed markedly lower values for fracture resistance. This finding warrants further investigation, because inconsistency had clinical implications. In decreasing order, the fracture resistance of the other materials was as follows: the poly(methyl methacrylate) materials, Caulk temporary bridge resin and G-C Unifast temporary resin; the composite material, Protemp; and the epimine material, Scutan.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1993        PMID： 8366461     DOI： 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90038-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN： 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of flexural strength of resin interim restorations impregnated with various types of silane treated and untreated glass fibres.

Authors:  K S Naveen; J P Singh; M Viswambaran; R K Dhiman
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-09-14

2.  Effect of Dietary Simulating Solvents on the Mechanical Properties of Provisional Restorative Materials-An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Bipin Y Muley; Sameera R Shaikh; Mohana M Tagore; Arun N Khalikar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-06-15

3.  The effect of glass and polyethylene fiber reinforcement on flexural strength of provisional restorative resins: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Parthasarathy Natarajan; C Thulasingam
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-07-14

4.  Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Provisional Crown and Bridge Materials-An Invitro Study.

Authors:  Ankita Singh; Sandeep Garg
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-08-01

5.  The effect of different fiber reinforcements on flexural strength of provisional restorative resins: an in-vitro study.

Authors:  Vaibhav Deorao Kamble; Rambhau D Parkhedkar; Tushar Krishnarao Mowade
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Comparison of polymer-based temporary crown and fixed partial denture materials by diametral tensile strength.

Authors:  Seung-Ryong Ha; Jae-Ho Yang; Jai-Bong Lee; Jung-Suk Han; Sung-Hun Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  In vitro comparison of flexural strength and elastic modulus of three provisional crown materials used in fixed prosthodontics.

Authors:  Vachan Poonacha; Seema Poonacha; Basavaraj Salagundi; P L Rupesh; Rohit Raghavan
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2013-12-01

8.  In vitro study of fracture strength of provisional crown materials.

Authors:  Isil Karaokutan; Gulsum Sayin; Ozlem Kara
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Elastic, viscoelastic and viscoplastic contributions to compliance during deformation under stress in prosthodontic temporization materials.

Authors:  Tritala K Vaidyanathan; Jayalakshmi Vaidyanathan; David Arghavani
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2016-08-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.